Metanet Forums

Okay this is ridiculous, let's get this moving again!

I agree with you - and it's my fault - but I only half agree. Can you do one ignoring toasters' image, kkstrong?

I believe my image still works if you ignore toasters image.... ends and starts of black... and it flows much better off of the one before toasters too... do you just want a new image together?

kkstrong wrote:I believe my image still works if you ignore toasters image.... ends and starts of black... and it flows much better off of the one before toasters too... do you just want a new image together?

No no, that one flows off my one fine. We can finally get moving... :D
Donfuy's up.

Oh, you're totally right. Donfuy's up, and we need a bunch of you to sign up again. Please recruit peoples!

Of course I want another spot as well.

might as well
sign me up

Oh yeah, I'm in.

In.

Done.

That little spec in the eye that doesn't line up really bugs me.

i feel bad fr bufar because he gotta connect with the static xd

I think I nailed the static.

As usual, please put me back on the list.

Inspired wrote:

bufar wrote:I think I nailed the static.

As usual, please put me back on the list.

*like*

*like even more*

Thanks guys. I was a little uncertain that it came out okay.

bufar is better than everybody. Sorry for not PMing you!

Image imaging.

Add me in. This will possibly be the last time I'll be in cause sometimes it's more of a chore.

Universezero wrote:

fucking WIN!

Spawn of Yanni wrote:

Universezero wrote:

These summarize our collective interest in naked pedophile chicks.

Life247 wrote:These summarize our collective interest in naked pedophile chicks.

I never knew we had any.
xd

Oh yeah, put me back on again.

Im sorry I didnt really have any good ideas.. sign me up again

Life247 wrote:These summarize our collective interest in naked pedophile chicks.

Inspired wrote:http://i359.photobucket.com/albums/oo31 ... aste-1.png

And so it continues...