Page 16 of 16
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.03.30 (03:11)
by oxymoron93
Woah, well done. Truly remarkable I didn't see that. I guess it was quite easy to beat me. xD
There is also something something that can be added to the run to make it slight faster. Probably about 30 frames. Check map with ID: 184369
Well done, once again! :D
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.06.04 (13:33)
by oxymoron93
So... Taken 86-2. Not much of a run, but I didn't waste time in the end. Kinda show everyone that the rocket isn't much of a threat. xD
Also, played 52-4, got 2nd place. I believe the way I fall through middle tunnel is faster. Check user map ID: 239888. Even tho I executed same beginnin' as Voted, and even more important, same ending as him, I am still about 20 frames short. I think I lose much frames within the part of the map where gold is. I encouraged you to play it! :D
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.06.10 (16:26)
by SpartaX18
You climb way slower and execute longer slides than Straw. Plus that little bump at 2nd fall...
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.06.10 (21:54)
by oxymoron93
Well i have put my brain to the test and have thought about my run a little bit more. And yes, I think you are right, I lose more frames in beginning. Once again, it is proven that I am bad with frames judging, tho I still think that my way of second fall is a bit faster. And yeah, for extra frames, everyone can try and execute Straw's fall in the beginning as well. xD
Also, way to go for tailow for some runs, I have checked earlier when I had time... Like that 121 run on 84-2 and also tying few probably maxed levels. Also, beating me in 52-3 by almost a second. I tied that now, but the run is wow, even easier than the one used by players before.
Also Velocity got two 0ths, I guess. Icy Sole with great runs on metanet levels. Also, Mr Doge, got back, for a bit, with several top10s too. :D
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.04 (04:18)
by oxymoron93
I went through a and b columns to see if there are any new changes and noticed both shomman and I lost 0th on a2-2 due to Rabbit. I have played that one again and retook it. I accomplished the run I had in my mind for months now. It is about managing to get gold and fall before gauss makes a single shot. Tho you can see that I have clipped so it might be possible to beat my run by a lot, if that part is done smoothly.
[Edit #1] 5.7.2016.
I just improved 98-4 by a lot. Did another thing I had in my mind for long time now which gives 400 frames in very beginning. I tested it in user level ID = 244733. I do lose much of the lead due to my extreme caution (yes, caution involves shaving the drone xD). I believe there is 200+ more frames left just with better finishing.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.09 (11:53)
by SpartaX18
So, just in case no one noticed, lately i tied 0th on 00-4 and took 04-0, 08-2 and 62-4.
EDIT: Forgot about 12-0 + i just took 14-0.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.13 (14:54)
by SpartaX18
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.14 (04:13)
by XandoToaster
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention here: I re-took 04-1 a few days ago. Made a slight change to the beginning of the route, which also ends up affecting the end. I don't know if this is actually a better route than I had before, but it looks cooler, which is the only metric that counts.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.16 (13:10)
by SpartaX18
Brand new delivery!
- 30-2
- 30-3
- 31-4
- 32-0
- 35-0
- 36-2
- 38-0
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.16 (15:18)
by SpartaX18
192 0ths!
New ones include:
- 38-4
- 39-0
- 41-1 (just untied)
- 41-3
- 43-2
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.18 (11:27)
by SpartaX18
196!! Just 4 to go; i should hit the milestone today.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.07.18 (14:02)
by SpartaX18
Heeell yeeaaah, baybay! Two hundred! Recent 0ths:
- 47-3
- 50-1
- 50-4
- 54-1 (retaken)
Also got a 2nd on 54-0.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.08.31 (20:03)
by ska
Hey, anyway to see what 0ths, if any, I have left on 2.0?
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.09.01 (23:47)
by oxymoron93
Your top 10 scores:
Press here02-3 - 9th. [Ben Schultz, 6598]
09-3 - 8th. [Ben Schultz, 6555] [Possibly maxed]
09-4 - 5th. [Ben Schultz, 16066]
10-2 - 7th. [Ben Schultz, 5865] [Possibly maxed]
33-1 - 8th. [Ben Schultz, 9504]
41-0 - 6th. [Ben Schultz, 5123]
51-4 - 6th. [Ben Schultz, 9446]
55-0 - 9th. [Ben Schultz, 5155] [Possibly maxed]
60-0 - 7th. [Ben Schultz, 7343]
63-0 - 4th. [Ben Schultz, 7043]
71-4 - 9th. [Ben Schultz, 11846]
90-2 - 3rd. [Ben Schultz, 7616]
101-2 - 4th. [Ben Schultz, 17152]
101-4 - 8th. [Ben Schultz, 10171]
102-4 - 5th. [Ben Schultz, 6028]
104-1 - 6th. [Ben Schultz, 7174]
107-2 - 5th. [Ben Schultz, 15110]
108-4 - 4th. [Ben Schultz, 12996]
113-3 - 9th. [Ben Schultz, 13034]
113-4 - 7th. [Ben Schultz, 10035]
118-3 - 2nd. [Ben Schultz, 8557]
119-3 - 9th. [Ben Schultz, 5692]
119-4 - 7th. [Ben Schultz, 2919]
As of 29th August 2016.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.09.03 (08:28)
by ska
What do you mean by 118-3, etc? I checked the a and b columns, but these scores didn't correspond.
Thank you, btw.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.09.03 (10:32)
by XandoToaster
118-3 refers to b8-3, 104-1 refers to a4-1, etc.
I checked some of the scores oxy posted, and they are correct.
Re: Super-Official N 2.0 Highscoring Thread (00-0 to b9-4)
Posted: 2016.09.05 (13:37)
by ska
XandoToaster wrote:118-3 refers to b8-3, 104-1 refers to a4-1, etc.
I checked some of the scores oxy posted, and they are correct.
Hmmm, not sure what I was mixing it up with. Thanks.