Presidents?

http://nmaps.net/user/apakenua · Postby **Apakenua** » 2011.03.25 (00:27)

Bush. How was he?
Obama. Did you go for him? How is he?
I hear Donald Trump is thinking for running next.

http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924 · Postby **Rose** » 2011.03.25 (00:52)

RALPH NADER 2012

http://nmaps.net/user/im_bad_at_n · Postby **im_bad_at_n** » 2011.03.25 (01:45)

Rose wrote:RALPH NADER 2012

QFE

Postby **otters~1** » 2011.03.25 (02:06)

I'm still waiting for Ron Paul to gather more than local support.

http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT · Postby **Tanner** » 2011.03.25 (02:47)

Nostromo wrote:I'm still waiting for Ron Paul to gather more than local support.

Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. Just FYI.

http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924 · Postby **Rose** » 2011.03.25 (02:50)

hairscapades wrote:
Nostromo wrote:I'm still waiting for Ron Paul to gather more than local support.
Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. Just FYI.

While that may be stupid, I know some smart people who don't believe in evolution either. I don't let a politician's religious beliefs affect my opinion of him, as that's no better than the Christians who refuse to vote for any non-Christian.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Vyacheslav** » 2011.03.25 (02:52)

No love for Sarah Palin?

http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924 · Postby **Rose** » 2011.03.25 (02:53)

l'oeuvre wrote:No love for Sarah Palin?

http://www.qdb.us/294961

http://nmaps.net/user/ENT474 · Postby **ENT474** » 2011.03.25 (02:56)

Rose wrote:
l'oeuvre wrote:No love for Sarah Palin?
http://www.qdb.us/294961

That made me lol

http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT · Postby **Tanner** » 2011.03.25 (03:00)

Rose wrote:
hairscapades wrote:
Nostromo wrote:I'm still waiting for Ron Paul to gather more than local support.
Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. Just FYI.
While that may be stupid, I know some smart people who don't believe in evolution either. I don't let a politician's religious beliefs affect my opinion of him, as that's no better than the Christians who refuse to vote for any non-Christian.

No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.

http://nmaps.net/user/ENT474 · Postby **ENT474** » 2011.03.25 (03:04)

hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.

Very true. But I feel that the Christians don't think that.

Postby **otters~1** » 2011.03.25 (03:53)

hairscapades wrote:
Nostromo wrote:I'm still waiting for Ron Paul to gather more than local support.
Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. Just FYI.

Maybe so, but you can positively sink into that smile.

http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924 · Postby **Rose** » 2011.03.25 (04:19)

hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.

I was under the impression that evolution is still a theory. It's a very well-supported theory, but I'm unaware of any hard proof. Seeing as how I believe in evolution though, I'd love to see said proof if you could show me.

ENT474 wrote:
hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.
Very true. But I feel that the Christians don't think that.

Not all Christians believe in New Earth crap. I was a theistic evolutionist for a while before becoming agnostic. Just saying.

http://nmaps.net/user/ENT474 · Postby **ENT474** » 2011.03.25 (04:25)

Rose wrote:
hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.
I was under the impression that evolution is still a theory. It's a very well-supported theory, but I'm unaware of any hard proof. Seeing as how I believe in evolution though, I'd love to see said proof if you could show me.

Well... Um....
*looks for biology book*
*cannot find biology book*

There are two examples that come to mind. One study examined length of beaks, and evolution to fit the seed they wanted (because of scarcity of seed etc.) the other one had to do with the domestication of foxes. Those provide pretty strong evidence that evolution is true.
True there is no direct proof (one cannot live for millions of years studying the change from apes to humans) but at least it has some indirect evidence in the fossil record.

(Oh, and btw, a scientific theory means it is right, in that it will not be overturned any time soon, and it is very well established an essentially a cornerstone of modern evolutionary biology.)

http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924 · Postby **Rose** » 2011.03.25 (04:29)

(Oh, and btw, a scientific theory means it is right, in that it will not be overturned any time soon, and it is very well established an essentially a cornerstone of modern evolutionary biology.)

I know, but there are some people who hold the same skepticism toward modern science that you and I do toward God and point to stuff that was considered common knowledge back in the old days, such as that the Earth was flat and the center of the universe. I think they're horribly wrong, but it's not like they're arguing that the sky is purple.

http://nmaps.net/user/ENT474 · Postby **ENT474** » 2011.03.25 (04:35)

at least not THAT many think so. heh.

http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT · Postby **Tanner** » 2011.03.25 (04:57)

Rose wrote:
hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.
I was under the impression that evolution is still a theory. It's a very well-supported theory, but I'm unaware of any hard proof. Seeing as how I believe in evolution though, I'd love to see said proof if you could show me.

So that Suki doesn't have to tirade on this again, I'm going to link to a post of his that was inspired by someone saying a similar thing in regards to a theory that is much more controversial in the scientific community than the theory of evolution: http://forum.droni.es/viewtopic.php?p=140165#p140165

Haha. You're actually featured quite heavily in this thread, Rose. Enjoy the trip down memory lane.

http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924 · Postby **Rose** » 2011.03.25 (13:57)

hairscapades wrote:
Rose wrote:
hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.
I was under the impression that evolution is still a theory. It's a very well-supported theory, but I'm unaware of any hard proof. Seeing as how I believe in evolution though, I'd love to see said proof if you could show me.
So that Suki doesn't have to tirade on this again, I'm going to link to a post of his that was inspired by someone saying a similar thing in regards to a theory that is much more controversial in the scientific community than the theory of evolution: http://forum.droni.es/viewtopic.php?p=140165#p140165

Haha. You're actually featured quite heavily in this thread, Rose. Enjoy the trip down memory lane.

Ahaha. Oh man. I'm embarrassed, quite frankly.

As far as the post, yeah, I think more people should learn about this. I think the modern casual use of the word "theory" makes the average person give real theories less importance and credibility than they're due.

http://nmaps.net/user/apakenua · Postby **Apakenua** » 2011.03.25 (15:27)

[

hairscapades wrote:No, believing in the Christian god and believing in evolution are not the same. The latter has proof, the former does not.

I was under the impression that evolution is still a theory. It's a very well-supported theory, but I'm unaware of any hard proof. Seeing as how I believe in evolution though, I'd love to see said proof if you could show me.[/quote]
So that Suki doesn't have to tirade on this again, I'm going to link to a post of his that was inspired by someone saying a similar thing in regards to a theory that is much more controversial in the scientific community than the theory of evolution: http://forum.droni.es/viewtopic.php?p=140165#p140165

As far as the post, yeah, I think more people should learn about this. I think the modern casual use of the word "theory" makes the average person give real theories less importance and credibility than they're due.[/quote]

I completely understand.

Postby **t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư** » 2011.03.25 (17:47)

hairscapades wrote:Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. Just FYI.

Wow. Dealbreaker.

(Also, thanks for the trip down memory lane. It made my day a bit brighter.)

http://nmaps.net/user/spawn_of_yanni · Postby **Spawn of Yanni** » 2011.03.25 (19:15)

DemonzLunchBreak wrote:I also might write in Charlie Sheen.

Bi-partisan? More like...

http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT · Postby **Tanner** » 2011.03.25 (20:51)

Spawn of Yanni wrote:
DemonzLunchBreak wrote:I also might write in Charlie Sheen.
Bi-partisan? More like...

-.-

http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33 · Postby **scythe** » 2011.03.30 (20:36)

I'd vote for Jim Webb. I am definitely hoping, however unlikely, that Obama loses the primaries in 2012 and we get a more interesting Democrat candidate, preferably Webb, though it looks like he's retiring which frankly sucks.

Obama, I liked him when he said he'd close Guantanamo within the year and stopped liking him when he didn't do that.

Quoting myself...

The guy has a long track record of saying he's going to do something, and not doing it. Take his proclamation, upon entering office, that the detention center at Guantanamo would be closed within a year. It's still open. Take his statements back around 2004-2006 that we needed to decriminalize marijuana. It took two years of the same issue rising to the top of polls for the guy to even address it, and he brushed it off. Take his promise to fight for better healthcare -- except during the voting, I heard more from Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid than I did from Obama. Or the whole "let's talk diplomatically to Iran".

I'm not really surprised or disappointed by Obama; the guy ran on a moderate platform and governed as a moderate. His position on education frankly scares me but he won't have time to implement any of that crazy shit so I'm not really concerned about it.

Postby **t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư** » 2011.03.31 (02:50)

scythe wrote:[Obama's] position on education frankly scares me but he won't have time to implement any of that crazy shit so I'm not really concerned about it.

...not that he'd do it even if he did have the time, according to you.

Postby **otters~1** » 2011.03.31 (04:24)

T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:
scythe wrote:[Obama's] position on education frankly scares me but he won't have time to implement any of that crazy shit so I'm not really concerned about it.
...not that he'd do it even if he did have the time, according to you.

And, of course, our education system is more or less fucked if we leave it alone, anyway.

Metanet Forums

Presidents?

Who is online