Some sort of pipe or maybe it's just a duck.reventón wrote:What's that angry-limbless-duck-looking thing the bear is holding?
(I can't talk back to you, scythe! Your name is blue!)
Some sort of pipe or maybe it's just a duck.reventón wrote:What's that angry-limbless-duck-looking thing the bear is holding?
T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:Traditions and holiday practices are fucking stupid. Many of them have even become mockeries of the original reasons they were celebrated. The only reason your culture would celebrate some events and not others are accident of birth, and this is by no means a decent reason. The practices of these remembrance holidays so bizarre as to make one wonder how people could think they were the best means to celebrate the holiday. You will never find a reason to celebrate these ridiculous holidays by their ridiculous practices apart from the fact that the majority of your culture is doing so.
In other words, I think you and I see eye to eye on this.
Nonetheless, I found it's best to shut up and wear the stupid flower, eat the stupid turkey, decorate the stupid tree, dress up like a tard and yell "bloogie-woogie-woo", etc. It's not worth it to be some kind of counter-culturalist revolutionary, because that would require taking the cause seriously, which it is far from deserving.
I'd like these stupid traditions to go away, but it'd be ridiculous to take an active stance against it (and the sheeple would unify mindlessly against you if you did anyway). Instead, I settle for begrudgingly doing the bare minimum to follow the required practices and never encourage anyone or organize anything for myself. I put my focus on enjoying the festivities for their own sake, with the silly motivations for them completely aside, because they usually feature alcohol and pretty girls.
In the long term, holidays disappear because people stop caring about them and taking them seriously, not because of activism like refusing to wear a flower.
So wear the stupid flower.
I'll respond to both of these at once:MAXXXON wrote:You don't need an excuse to eat more candy :Dsmartalco wrote:As totally and completely meaningless as it may be, Thanksgiving is still fucking awesome because I can stuff myself with turkey and mashed potatoes and pumpkin pie at pretty much any location in the US. Don't be dissin' my turkey.T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:eat the stupid turkey
In general though, I agree with the theme of this thread. Which is why I treat halloween as simply an excuse to eat more candy.
In regards to the OP, is it really that much of an inconvenience to wear the flower? I would think that by looking out of place and giving the impression that you don't support the holiday (which may not be true, but people may perceive it that way), you'd end up with more problems by not wearing the flower than you would by wearing it. It's not like you have to wear ankle weights or something; just put the flower on for one day and be done with it.
Why would that even enter into your process of deciding what music to listen to? If you worry so much about what other people think of your tastes, you'll turn into AF. Or maybe you'll turn into a frog. My advice: Hope you get the frog.bobaganuesh_2 wrote: Back to the "being responsible" thing. Recently I heard that "only hipsters listen to Crystal Castles". wat. Since when does listening to certain music make you responsible for a particular wardrobe, and hence a certain sub-culture, and hence certain values?
Haha, okay, now I know what this thread is about. Someone's having an identity crisis.Ideally I'd like all "aspects" of myself to be not dependant on each other; my musical tastes would not necessitate fully towards my wardrobe, but could contribute to it to a degree; neither would fully necessitate my political interests but may have some iota of influence; etc.
I don't think that it's ever done anyone any good to worry about the motivation for their sexual preferences. If I had to guess, I'd say that it's just the familiarity effect. If your life has mostly consisted of interacting with non-black women, then that's who you'll go for.The problem is, how can I destroy the responsibility "between" my other kinds of preferences? For whatever psychosexualbiological reasons, me being "Caucasian" necessiates fully my non-desire for black women. The relationship between the body and the biopsychosexual desires, and between the mind and the subconcious desires are not equal (I think this equation is wonky, i.e. the relationship is fuzzy). It works contrary to my artistic preferences.
It's not a contradiction, it's a non sequitur.Does anyone else notice this contradiction?
Mhm. I'll be taking that 10% of your daily income, now.(I can't talk back to you, scythe! Your name is blue!)
http://pastebin.com/hbFWrm00scythe wrote:Why would that even enter into your process of deciding what music to listen to? If you worry so much about what other people think of your tastes, you'll turn into AF. Or maybe you'll turn into a frog. My advice: Hope you get the frog.bobaganuesh_2 wrote: Back to the "being responsible" thing. Recently I heard that "only hipsters listen to Crystal Castles". wat. Since when does listening to certain music make you responsible for a particular wardrobe, and hence a certain sub-culture, and hence certain values?
whaaaaaaaaaaat the fuuuuuuuck.squibbles wrote:http://pastebin.com/hbFWrm00scythe wrote:Why would that even enter into your process of deciding what music to listen to? If you worry so much about what other people think of your tastes, you'll turn into AF. Or maybe you'll turn into a frog. My advice: Hope you get the frog.bobaganuesh_2 wrote: Back to the "being responsible" thing. Recently I heard that "only hipsters listen to Crystal Castles". wat. Since when does listening to certain music make you responsible for a particular wardrobe, and hence a certain sub-culture, and hence certain values?
Makes me sad I'm IRCless ;____;squibbles wrote:http://pastebin.com/hbFWrm00
I bet hippocrites are really cute! :3squibbles wrote:http://pastebin.com/hbFWrm00
I could care less what people think about my musical tastes, I'm only pointing out the logically fallacy in the statement "lo-fi elecotronica denotes hipsterdom", at least frm my point of view.scythe wrote:Why would that even enter into your process of deciding what music to listen to? If you worry so much about what other people think of your tastes, you'll turn into AF. Or maybe you'll turn into a frog. My advice: Hope you get the frog.bobaganuesh_2 wrote: Back to the "being responsible" thing. Recently I heard that "only hipsters listen to Crystal Castles". wat. Since when does listening to certain music make you responsible for a particular wardrobe, and hence a certain sub-culture, and hence certain values?
Nah. I'm just too lazy to wear a commemorative flower.scythe wrote:Haha, okay, now I know what this thread is about. Someone's having an identity crisis.Ideally I'd like all "aspects" of myself to be not dependant on each other; my musical tastes would not necessitate fully towards my wardrobe, but could contribute to it to a degree; neither would fully necessitate my political interests but may have some iota of influence; etc.
Familiarity makes perfect sense, but one's inability to be transcend their sexual preferences contradicts the concept of one being able to transcend their culture. There's no transcendance taking place on all planes of the human.scythe wrote:I don't think that it's ever done anyone any good to worry about the motivation for their sexual preferences. If I had to guess, I'd say that it's just the familiarity effect. If your life has mostly consisted of interacting with non-black women, then that's who you'll go for.The problem is, how can I destroy the responsibility "between" my other kinds of preferences? For whatever psychosexualbiological reasons, me being "Caucasian" necessiates fully my non-desire for black women. The relationship between the body and the biopsychosexual desires, and between the mind and the subconcious desires are not equal (I think this equation is wonky, i.e. the relationship is fuzzy). It works contrary to my artistic preferences.
I have the same peculiarity. I rarely find myself attracted to a black girl, though it has happened.
Ah.scythe wrote:It's not a contradiction, it's a non sequitur.Does anyone else notice this contradiction?
Okay then, SlappyMcGee. Explain to me why you wrote what I presume is a response to the remarks I directed at Tanner and gloomp.=w= wrote:Fuck off, boba.
Okay.bobaganuesh_2 wrote:No, you were fairly reasonable, in retrospect. gloomp crossed the line, in my opinion.
welcome to the internetMAXXXON wrote:Rather than being a jackass, care to explain how?hairscapades wrote:Congratulations on completely misunderstanding everything so thoroughly. You really don't mess around, do you?MAXXXON wrote:In regards to the OP, is it really that much of an inconvenience to wear the flower? I would think that by looking out of place and giving the impression that you don't support the holiday (which may not be true, but people may perceive it that way), you'd end up with more problems by not wearing the flower than you would by wearing it. It's not like you have to wear ankle weights or something; just put the flower on for one day and be done with it.
...Nah, you know what, forget it. I'm out of friends on this forum anyway. Fuck you all.
Hi there, who the fuck are you?Big Bird wrote:welcome to the internet
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.
Yeah, we wear poppies in rememberance of the soldiers that fought in all wars, including wars currently being fought. There's no mandatory donation, but I guess one could stroll over to the nearest legion and donate a buck. This entails that I have no idea where the money raised fromintnut wrote:I'm mighty confused. You wear poppies in canada? I live in Britain, and we wear poppies on (and around) the 11th of November because that is remembrance day. Everyone in the country has a minute silence at 11am to remember the dead from all wars since WWI who sacrificed their freedom for us and the nation. As for the poppies, when you get your poppy you make a donation to the British legion, a charity that provides support for (ex-)servicemen and their families.
I'd be interested to know where any money raised from your poppies goes. As for wearing them, there isn't really a massive social stigma from not wearing them, although there'd be a fuss if someone in a position of importance or someone on tv didn't. I usually buy one, but then tend not to wear it.
As for your points for not wearing them, I think you're being a bit obtuse. Just because you have no control over who you are or where you live does not mean that you don't necessarily owe anything to your ancestors, or that you should have no support for their cause.
(I'll admit I tl;dr'd a lot of this thread, so if I haven't fully understood something, or my points are null by now, I apologise.)
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests