Metanet Forums

You can give three votes per post, one post in 6 hours. You can vote for everyone on the forum, including yourself. Every 30th day we get a winner and I reset the points. There are two types of points: negative and positive. If you want that people don't know who you voted for, you can send me a private message. I'll keep a scoreboard here.

And seriously, no non-integer votes. Think you could bend the rules a bit, eh?

I'm giving three positive points to myself.

--SCOREBOARD--

1.blue_tetris ................ 17
2. Guiseppi ................ 5
3. EdoI ...................... 4
4. UniverseZero.............. 3
5. BionicCryonic ............ 2
6= Pixon ...................... 1
6= 29403 ..................... 1
6= Wight ................. 1
6= Sept ................... 1
6= Zilla .................... 1
6= guy_zap .............. 1
6= maxson ................ 1
6= ninja143 ................... 1
6= GTM ........................1
15= Ampersand ............ -1
15= PALEMOON .............. -1
17. stonedagle ............... -3

1 point for Dave.
1 point for 29403.
1 point for Laurie.

Minus three for Ampersand for recent abuse of power.

(Tunco123: Growl! I wanted the 14000th post in Fun & Games!)

999_Springs wrote:Minus three for Ampersand for recent abuse of power.

(Tunco123: Growl! I wanted the 14000th post in Fun & Games!)

I didn't even knew it was 14000th post. :/

Rules change - you can now give three votes in 6 hours instead of 12.

What is the point of this? :/

29403 wrote:What is the point of this? :/

Now that you bring up that question:

forum.therealn.com wrote:Fun & Games
Play messageboard games, do silly question-and-answer things, and just waste some time with your fellow forum-goers.

I think that basically answers your question.

A similar argument can be applied to all the other threads in Fun & Games.

rn wrote:Then, analyze your idea. If your topic facilitates spamming (as in multiple or useless posts) it would be wise not to create the topic, as it will most likely be closed.

This argument counters it.

Let me see how this goes. If it goes all spammy, looooock! :P

Plus three to Mr. Tetris.

+1 for Guiseppi
+1 for Ampersand
+1 for Pixon.

Plus three for Rhekatou

+1 for me, to keep up.
-1 for blue_tetris, to put me on the first place (nothing personal).
+1 for 999_Springs, for actively updating RtaB.

-3 for Rhekatou for voting for himself.

EDIT: I hate this 6 hour limit. But I'll just count this and follow the 6 hour limit.

+1 Sept
+1 Guiseppi
-1 Skyline

Plus three again for blue_tetris.

-2 for EdoI.
+1 for Zilla.

+2 for me.
-1 for b_t.

-1 for EdoI.
+1 for b_t
+1 for Universe0.

29403, 6 hours limit is for you, too.

Ah screw it.
EDIT: Since it's time, count these votes.

I counted them now, 29403.
My votes:

-2 for 29403.
+1 for EdoI.

No offense, but in my opinion, as for the 'vote for yourself rule', you're the biggest abuser of it.

This game is flawed.

29403 wrote:No offense, but in my opinion, as for the 'vote for yourself rule', you're the biggest abuser of it.

Actually, I got the idea of this from VoteTheNation, where it is also possible. Personally, I see nothing wrong about it, and I don't intend to change the rules.

Well, it's alright to give youself a vote once in a while, but for every single post - that's going to give such an unfair advantage. If it wasn't for me, you would be at 7, and way over the top over time. The voting for yourself is still flawed. I don't care at all, but people who take this seriously will :P

+1 for 29403
+1 for Ampersand
-1 for Edoi