Metanet Forums

Not including user-created levels.

What I mean by "user-created levels" Is userlevels as well as Column 80 - 89. Only the game, not anything else. (That may put some points out of the score.)
Note: I made it changeble for people to switch answers. Oh, quite sorry for being so obscure. (like really.)

4. With or without user levels.

3.5 without

5 with

I'd say about a 4 without. 5.1 in including everything.

I don't understand what you're asking here. The levels in N, the game itself, or what?

ENT474 wrote:Not including user-created levels.

I voted on this before reading that sentence. I voted 5. Change it to a 3.

If you include user-created levels, N is the only fun thing I have never grown bored of since picking it up. It's pretty amazing.

What a stupid poll. 1428.

3.5 without.

5 with.

1428 with community circa 2005.

3.5 with community today.

Yes, I must say that the quality of maps is just not what it used to be back 5 years ago... sad.

anti-snipers to the rescueeeeeeee!
5.0 and faved

i would rate it good

n game is much qualite but i it wuld be beter if n had a gun to k1ll the drons lol

987654321 wrote:Yes, I must say that the quality of maps is just not what it used to be back 5 years ago... sad.

I'm sorry, but how the heck do you know?
--------------
five.

five with.

millions and hundreds with community.

I would have voted for 1428 but the lag that occurs in some days cause me to drop off 1423 in value.

So,with or without user levels, 5 stars

BKPB58 wrote:I would have voted for 1428 but the lag that occurs in some days cause me to drop off 1423 in value.

So,with or without user levels, 5 stars

So, I'm not pointing to anyone in particular, but why won't we add new levels to the game if they all are only with a 3.5? What with all the experience our users have, I'm sure we could make levels for the game worthy of at least a 4 or even a 4.5? Why should be be stuck with levels nobody likes? I'm not saying we should get rid of all of them, but at least the ones with low ratings.

Kablizzy wrote:1428 with community circa 2005.

3.5 with community today.

It's just as good, just not as good for you because all the things that make you nostalgic are gone.

Universezero wrote:

Kablizzy wrote:1428 with community circa 2005.

3.5 with community today.

It's just as good, just not as good for you because all the things that make you nostalgic are gone.

Right, and good for me = good for everyone. Right? I mean, isn't nostalgia awesome, and aren't Rorschach masks bad? I dunno, I'm rambling now.

5. Putting aside all the fun and replayability, the sheer uniqueness of the five level per episode, stay-up-til-3-beating-83-4 system is incredibly addicting, even when I've beat this game six times.

I'm sorry but i don't really understand your question...
Does my rating have to be the average of all levels from 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 column ? So it's 4/5.
Or do i have to rate the game itself ? So it's 5/5.
And do i have to take in count Numa and all user-created levels or/and the community ? So it's 1428.
Please be more clear.

lol I was way too broad with this. The description says (I think) rate the game itself, first 9 columns (80's not included)