Code Editing or Z-Snap?

[Tunco]

Actually I don't how to code snap but I know a lot about it.But it depends to situation,but if I can do code snap,I would prefer z-snap because it looks more artistic and natural.

[seven_two]

I can move objects by pixels using the mouse. I find code editing tedious unless it is for teleporters or glitched objects.

[The Kitchen Sink]

There's no such thing as Z-snap. There's no snap, namely. :P

I never have any reason to do so. C-snap works fine for me.

There are rare occasions (such as making those sort of glitched thwumps) where I need more precision, and in such cases I code edit.

[squibbles]

There's no such thing as Z-snap. There's no snap, namely. :P

I never have any reason to do so. C-snap works fine for me.

There are rare occasions (such as making those sort of glitched thwumps) where I need more precision, and in such cases I code edit.

Actually, it does snap, because you can place an object at half-pixel increments. It snaps it to the pixel.

[Ncouraging]

z snap all the way, but code editing when i make a NaN on a drone, or a glitched item on nreality. but i use z snap more.

Depends. I use z-snap for curved lines of mines/gold, but code editing when I want to place something in a fraction of a c-snap (usually 1/2 c-snap, so 3 pixels).

same

[mintnut]

And what do all of you use z-snap for? You clearly don't need it...I agree with the GHM stance. Maybe if you spent more time getting the best out of x- and c-snap, you'd make better maps.

[Rose]

And what do all of you use z-snap for? You clearly don't need it...I agree with the GHM stance. Maybe if you spent more time getting the best out of x- and c-snap, you'd make better maps.

I rarely need it, but when I'm using arcs or need to get a slightly slanted effect, I see no problem with using it.