Etz wrote:It's getting pretty hard now.
Let's see who's still in. golfkid is right, this challenge gets tighter and tighter.
Even though I like this "scoring system" I think it would be more fair if the cntest was held like the TWNS:
The first 4 ranks get points, and every map has to be played. Because for every player a different map is easier to play (I can't play the actual map as well as the first for example.) Now, if a player doesn't manage to get into the next round, because the map was more difficult to him than to others, it's not a good indicator for him, how ood he really is.
If we played EVERY map instead (which, I have to admit, would be a long competition then) nobody would be disadvantaged.
I hope I made my opinion clear to everybody, since my english is not that good.
I'll come up with a system like that for the semifinals. Oh yeah, that reminds me, would anyone be at a disadvantage if the semifinals were continued after Holiday Break? I mean, I'm thinking that that's what I'll do, if no one objects to it.
Also, in the event of a tie, since we have a handy system in NReality that allows me to tell who submitted a run first, whoever is in the top 4 (0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd for this round) wins, regardless of if they're score is the same, since whoever submits the run first will be closer to the 0th.