Metanet 0ths Thread

[TheRealOne]

ska so the first thing you do after getting a 0th is to go try different versions of N right away just so that something can mess up? ^^

ughh.. no, I wanted to make sure the run worked in 1.4 too for some reason, and then everything went back to the default settings.. almost had a heart attack.
Edit: Doesn't matter... I took it back with a respectable 176.950 run.

Great run Ska. The seeker by the exit switch almost screwed over your whole run. That is going to be tough to be beat, but there are definitely room for improvement.

EDIT: Since I don't think that swipenet will post for him self, He took 24-0 with a pretty clean run.

[ska]

Great run Ska. The seeker by the exit switch almost screwed over your whole run. That is going to be tough to be beat, but there are definitely room for improvement.

Thanks. Well, believe it or not, but I can actually gauge the approximate position of the drone by the cleanliness of my run to that point. Obviously the end can be optimized, but getting that ending is maybe a one in ten occurrence; add to that an exceedingly difficulty of the rest of the run.

[EddyMataGallos]

Took 36-3 and 39-1 using Raif's beginning ^^, however i had a really slow ending because I wanted to secure the run, i may improve maybe not, too hard :P

[golf]

Sweet run on 39-1! I wondered if anybody would ever do Lim's route, and you improved on it.

[TheRealOne]

Took 36-3 and 39-1 using Raif's beginning ^^, however i had a really slow ending because I wanted to secure the run, i may improve maybe not, too hard :P

Awesome Eddy. You are killing the 30s column. All but one of your 0ths in the 30s column was taken this week. Working on that column domination? ;)

31-3 - 117.525
36-1 - 141.325
36-3 - 61.975
37-0 - 123.200
37-2 - 198.450
38-0 - 184.175
38-1 - 179.350
39-0 - 125.325
39-1 - 138.475

[ska]

Awesome runs, Eddy.

Just to reiterate, since Mare cleaned the boards:

Player 0th changes report for EddyMataGallos:

Gained 8 scores:
01-1 - Old: [Last_FairyTail, 199.050] New: [EddyMataGallos, 199.075]
36-1 - Old: [vankusss, 141.275] New: [EddyMataGallos, 141.325]
36-3 - Old: [vankusss, 61.850] New: [EddyMataGallos, 61.975]
37-0 - Old: [lookatthis, 122.650] New: [EddyMataGallos, 123.200]
37-2 - Old: [vankusss, 198.250] New: [EddyMataGallos, 198.450]
38-0 - Old: [xaelar, 182.525] New: [EddyMataGallos, 184.175]
38-1 - Old: [xaelar, 179.150] New: [EddyMataGallos, 179.350]
39-1 - Old: [Mr_Lim, 138.400] New: [EddyMataGallos, 138.475]

Before: 23 0th, 262 scores. After: 31 0th, 273 scores

[EddyMataGallos]

Thanks a lot for the feedback guys :D

[ska]

Thanks a lot for the feedback guys :D

de nada por supuesto.

[EddyMataGallos]

Took 39-3 by a crappy frame
Btw I updated my NHigh ignore list, only cheaters now, now it looks like this:

I only added cheaters who owned at least a 0th, I can be bothered to add every single cheater who own a top20 score :P
So am I missing anyone? Do you consider Just4TheFun & BlackyFrost as cheaters? Or even TGM_Project?

[ska]

Took 39-3 by a crappy frame
Btw I updated my NHigh ignore list, only cheaters now, now it looks like this:

I only added cheaters who owned at least a 0th, I can be bothered to add every single cheater who own a top20 score :P
So am I missing anyone? Do you consider Just4TheFun & BlackyFrost as cheaters? Or even TGM_Project?

I have absolutely no idea why you consider J4TF and BF as cheaters... TGM is a tricky one, because he has 2 sets of perfect jnjnj's on 8-1 but that alone doesn't really prove anything, I've done it myself on 34-3 and 90-3. . He denied cheating when asked about it so yeah... :/

Edit: Let's not forget cool who can jnjnjnjnjnjnjnjnjnnjnjnjnjnjn hahaha

[TheRealOne]

Took 39-3 by a crappy frame
Btw I updated my NHigh ignore list, only cheaters now, now it looks like this:
I only added cheaters who owned at least a 0th, I can be bothered to add every single cheater who own a top20 score :P
So am I missing anyone? Do you consider Just4TheFun & BlackyFrost as cheaters? Or even TGM_Project?

I have absolutely no idea why you consider J4TF and BF as cheaters... TGM is a tricky one, because he has 2 sets of perfect jnjnj's on 8-1 but that alone doesn't really prove anything, I've done it myself on 34-3 and 90-3. . He denied cheating when asked about it so yeah... :/

Edit: Let's not forget cool who can jnjnjnjnjnjnjnjnjnnjnjnjnjnjn hahaha

Currently we don't consider any of those three as cheaters. We have no proof that they have actually cheated, Especially J4TF and BF.

[ska]

haha, the only reason that you could have for thinking that is that they have no other 0ths. (They have other top-20s) which is totally ridiculous.. plus it's obvious the runs could be a lot cleaner with slowdown.

[EddyMataGallos]

haha, the only reason that you could have for thinking that is that they have no other 0ths. (They have other top-20s) which is totally ridiculous

well that was exactly what threw me to think they were cheaters, i dont think its that ridiculous, althrough the runs sure dont look cheated anyway
i was asking and you guys solved my doubts, topic closed ^^

EDIT: Took 41-1 & 41-4 (slighly innovated this one)

[vankusss]

Took 41-1

y u no take my 0ths?!

TGM is a tricky one, because he has 2 sets of perfect jnjnj's on 8-1 but that alone doesn't really prove anything, I've done it myself on 34-3 and 90-3. .
Edit: Let's not forget cool who can jnjnjnjnjnjnjnjnjnnjnjnjnjnjn hahaha

But your 34-3 is cheated so what's your point :O And I don't believe TGM was legit, because of those 8-1 perfect chimneys and 51-2

[ska]

This is vankusss frustrated.

[TheRealOne]

41-4 (slighly innovated this one)

Awesome innovation Eddy! So simple, yet so clever. That 0th has stood for a long time too. At least since before NReality.

[ska]

From TGM's 51-2:

688. J - 2 frames
690. Nothing - 1 frame
691. J - 2 frames
693. Nothing - 1 frame
694. J - 2 frames

Oh, why yes! He must have cheated! /sarcasm.

[vankusss]

Oh, why yes! He must have cheated! /sarcasm.

Instead of constantly trying to mock me, why don't you tell me why you never pulled stuff like that in your nreality runs? Like, EVER? Your 29-3 and 34-3 seem to have a lot of in common (perfect chimneying, overall suckiness of the runs). I know that after 5 years of claiming legitimity of your 34-3 you can't just say it's cheated, because that would ruin your remaining credibility, but still. Just don't try to convince me, please.

[EddyMataGallos]

41-4 (slighly innovated this one)

Awesome innovation Eddy! So simple, yet so clever. That 0th has stood for a long time too. At least since before NReality.

Thanks :D btw I tied 84-1 and I've got a doubt, is it maxed? Because it definitely seems to me theres at least a frame left, but dunno if I should keep trying.

[ska]

Nice one Eddy. It feels like you could squeeze one more frame out of it..

[TheRealOne]

Nice one Eddy. It feels like you could squeeze one more frame out of it..

I agree. I think there is another frame or two in there with the current route, but you really have to be willing to risk a 1729 frame run by getting zapped pixels from the exit. I suppose since you already have a tied run you have nothing to lose, but it still is not easy to get that far in to the run cleanly.

[Unreality]

TGM is a cheater, I saw him compete with L3X in a level, 0th was changed hand between them several times a day, no innovation involved, just closer and closer to frame perfect.

[ska]

TGM is a cheater, I saw him compete with L3X in a level, 0th was changed hand between them several times a day, no innovation involved, just closer and closer to frame perfect.

You saw him? Which level(s) are you talking about, just out of interest?

[Unreality]

TGM is a cheater, I saw him compete with L3X in a level, 0th was changed hand between them several times a day, no innovation involved, just closer and closer to frame perfect.

You saw him? Which level(s) are you talking about, just out of interest?

51-2
http://metanet.2.forumer.com/index.php? ... 8&st=0&hl=

Just from that thread for the 0th
L3X claimed at September 03, 2006 04:36 pm
TGM (hasn't posted)
L3X reclaimed at September 05, 2006 06:40 pm
TGM reclaimed at September 06, 2006 09:43 am
L3X reclaimed at September 07, 2006 07:22 pm
TGM reclaimed at September 08, 2006 05:30 am
L3X reclaimed at September 08, 2006 05:45 am
TGM reclaimed at an unknown day

However, the 0th changed hand more frequently than their replies about the reclaim.
I remembered I have kept check on that Level at that time, once L3X got a 0th and then TGM immediately got it back, it has happened quite a few times without them posting on the forum

[eru_bahagon]

As we are speaking about some old cheated runs, is someone able to take 56-2 ? Seriously, this one is way too clean.

(And it seems xaelar is playing 66-1, so why not trying 56-2 ? :))