Metanet 0ths Thread

http://nmaps.net/user/Pheidippides · Postby **Pheidippides** » 2010.07.05 (15:55)

vankusss wrote:wow clux, is that really you? (i mean, did the registrations from old forums work here or anyone could have registered that nick?)

Anyone could have registered it, but it's probably clux.

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.07.05 (15:57)

Wow! Clux! welcome to the forums. Is this really you? Any chance we will be seeing some new 0ths from you?

Pheidippides wrote:
vankusss wrote:wow clux, is that really you? (i mean, did the registrations from old forums work here or anyone could have registered that nick?)
Anyone could have registered it, but it's probably clux.

Unless it's LAT again >.>

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.05 (19:16)

TRO, why "again" ?

@vankuss : nice innov' at the begining. Unfortunately i don't think i'll have time to get it back. I'm working from monday to saturday...included =)

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.07.05 (22:00)

eru_bahagon wrote:TRO, why "again" ?

http://forums.droni.es/viewtopic.php?p= ... e1#p110962

LAT is a sneaky one.

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2010.07.10 (09:01)

0th for van on 72-4 and for golfkid on Episode 30

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.07.11 (10:13)

ska wrote:0th for van on 72-4 and for golfkid on Episode 30

yea that

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.11 (14:06)

74-4 IS MINE !

And ep 56, too. That's 50 0ths, again.

EDIT : and ep 52. Took 1st on 52-4. Anyone to try 0th ?^^

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2010.07.12 (16:02)

eru_bahagon wrote:74-4 IS MINE !

And ep 56, too. That's 50 0ths, again.

EDIT : and ep 52. Took 1st on 52-4. Anyone to try 0th ?^^

really cool man... played 52 for a bit tonight...
on my latest run, I was 1.525 seconds ahead of your episode run by the start of 52-2, but my hot streak stopped there... Still, I managed a fairly decent episode run and picked up a few highscores along the way... congrats, eru. i might have a go at 56-0 tomorrow...

http://www.nmaps.net/user/999_Springs · Postby **999_Springs** » 2010.07.12 (18:32)

Episode 15.

My first ever metanet 0th.

(If you don't remember, my zeroth ever metanet 0th was 45-4 back in February.)

Hopefully this one is going to last longer than the other one.

[Edit: 4 hours, 10 minutes, 49 seconds. Not even close.
RRRR
GNASH
SNARL
GRRRR
ROWRRRR...]

http://nmaps.net/user/golfkid · Postby **golf** » 2010.07.12 (18:38)

Congrats on taking an eru 0th. Those can be hard to beat.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.12 (18:41)

Congrats for taking that one but Ep 15 was made on 26 october 2008... a bit old.

I'm sorry, but I'll have to re-do it to get 35k.

Maybe today if i can't get a agd run on 52-4.

EDIT : ep 15, improved by 4 seconds.

EDIT 2 : 15-2, I love that level, i've played ep 15 to improve my run and it's a 0th now :)

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2010.07.13 (00:54)

eru_bahagon wrote: EDIT 2 : 15-2, I love that level, i've played ep 15 to improve my run and it's a 0th now :)

Don't you mean 15-1? ;)

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.07.13 (15:00)

well, screw 15-1 and 83-1, those are small fish!

87-3

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.13 (17:02)

87-3 is amazing =)

I've tried many times to beat the drones, then you still have to do a fast ending without hitting the door.

52-4 by 1 frame !!! :O It was my 4th try today... It took me about 1 minute of playing xD

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2010.07.14 (11:10)

eru_bahagon wrote:87-3 is amazing =)

I've tried many times to beat the drones, then you still have to do a fast ending without hitting the door.

52-4 by 1 frame !!! :O It was my 4th try today... It took me about 1 minute of playing xD

I was actually just playing that level to improve my incidental 19th and noticed you trumped LAT by a frame... So I ended up using a variant on Sammage's route. It ended up being a hybrid of eru's and Sammage's and is relatively easy to get a Top-20 using this method. Edit: got a subpar top-20 run on 52-3... so that means I've finally got a highscore for each level in that episode...

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.07.14 (12:18)

nice eru, but you should try doing what lat does, but with that gold lat misses, that would be like 2 sec difference. btw what's your success rate for that (inverted 8-tile)-double near the end?
btw off-topic, took 87-3 sr, too, like 8 minutes after hs

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.14 (18:11)

nice eru, but you should try doing what lat does, but with that gold lat misses, that would be like 2 sec difference

I tried... monday. Yesterday i completely miss that jump -it was my 1st try there-... i didn't skip it on purpose :)

btw what's your success rate for that (inverted 8-tile)-double near the end?

What's an inverted 8 tile ? I understand what you mean (double jump on the curve), but where can i find the "name" of each "tile" ?

To answer this question, i'd say about 2/3. Sometimes i miss it, and sometimes i do it too fast (and you hit blue point on my sketch). For me, it's clearly not an hard part of the run. The jump i completely missed yesterday is one of the hardest part^^ (see purple/pink points)
And most of the time, you just have a bad timing on an easy jump.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2010.07.15 (06:22)

Eru... I think of you as one of the most consistent N players today, and if anyone can pull off a 134+ run it would be you... just set aside an hour or 2 and I reckon you could do it ;)

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.07.15 (15:18)

12-3 yeaaa

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.15 (18:30)

12-3 is really good... but harder than the old route i think =)

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.15 (20:13)

Eru... I think of you as one of the most consistent N players today, and if anyone can pull off a 134+ run it would be you... just set aside an hour or 2 and I reckon you could do it ;)

1h20 of playing..., a lot more than 4 runs^^ but it's still under 134 :p

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.07.16 (01:05)

no matter it's under 134, it's awesome :P i'll never try for that level

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.07.16 (01:11)

eru_bahagon wrote:
Eru... I think of you as one of the most consistent N players today, and if anyone can pull off a 134+ run it would be you... just set aside an hour or 2 and I reckon you could do it ;)
1h20 of playing..., a lot more than 4 runs^^ but it's still under 134 :p

Well done sir! Care to get the missing golds on 96-4 and 46-4?

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2010.07.16 (07:20)

TheRealOne wrote:
eru_bahagon wrote:
Eru... I think of you as one of the most consistent N players today, and if anyone can pull off a 134+ run it would be you... just set aside an hour or 2 and I reckon you could do it ;)
1h20 of playing..., a lot more than 4 runs^^ but it's still under 134 :p
Well done sir! Care to get the missing golds on 96-4 and 46-4?

Ok.. firstly 46-4 is insanity - on top of a near flawless run which is required just to beat the first drone, you then need to chimney almost perfectly at the end of an already insane run... it's just... ludicrous...

Also, congrats eru on the great run - 134 was just a target but .875 is still pretty damn good.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.07.16 (11:04)

I'll certainly try 96-4. I've tried it two years ago (september 2008). I am more skilled now :)

However, I'm not good enough at chimneying to get a run on 46-4.

Metanet Forums

Metanet 0ths Thread

How many votes will this poll get?

Who is online