Page 158 of 161

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.04 (02:50)
by ska
Remember when there would be a 0th falling nearly every day? Metanet Farm remembers.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.04 (04:17)
by shomman
Image

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.05 (07:33)
by ska
Nice, although I can't help but feel it would have been better if you put the Metanet 'M' logo on the milk instead of comically plastering Mare and Raigan's compressed faces on there. (Compressed in both senses of the word.)

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.05 (08:30)
by shomman
Image
Image
Image

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.05 (08:57)
by ska
Please tell me which university you got your degree in graphic design so that I know to never go there.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.05 (09:01)
by shomman
My favourite part is how the Metanet logos are different sizes in each image.

I use the same tool as all the professionals, Microsoft Ultimate 2016 Pro Edition paint.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.03.10 (05:22)
by ska
That's interesting... I thought you had digitally adjusted the JPEG using notepad or something.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.04.01 (20:22)
by ska
Decided to make my comeback by taking 1-4.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.04.01 (21:36)
by EddyMataGallos
Holy shit nice new route, I just noticed it beats the MBD, guess that needs updating now...

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.04.01 (22:23)
by vankusss
Wow nice. It's always surprising when such an old route gets an upgrade.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.04.02 (00:11)
by ska
Thanks. I was also considering taking 4-1, but 1-4 just felt like the better choice because of where I am right now, geographically speaking.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.23 (01:08)
by EddyMataGallos
Took 43-2, 64-4, 73-3 and 79-3. The two middle ones include innovs, see if you can spot them without looking at the previous 0th runs.

With these ones I passed 400 level 0ths, too :D

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.24 (11:49)
by ska
EddyMataGallos wrote:Took 43-2, 64-4, 73-3 and 79-3. The two middle ones include innovs, see if you can spot them without looking at the previous 0th runs.

With these ones I passed 400 level 0ths, too :D
crappi already did that innov on 73-3, but the 79-3 run is looking really clean. I'd like to see 64-4 get more optimized, though.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.24 (16:13)
by EddyMataGallos
ska wrote:
EddyMataGallos wrote:Took 43-2, 64-4, 73-3 and 79-3. The two middle ones include innovs, see if you can spot them without looking at the previous 0th runs.

With these ones I passed 400 level 0ths, too :D
crappi already did that innov on 73-3, but the 79-3 run is looking really clean. I'd like to see 64-4 get more optimized, though.
Oh true, he did, I hadn't checked. Regarding 64-4, I did make several mistakes in the final gold room, mainly screwing the slope tile jump at the start, 253 can be achieved.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.25 (09:08)
by ska
EddyMataGallos wrote:
ska wrote:
EddyMataGallos wrote:Took 43-2, 64-4, 73-3 and 79-3. The two middle ones include innovs, see if you can spot them without looking at the previous 0th runs.

With these ones I passed 400 level 0ths, too :D
crappi already did that innov on 73-3, but the 79-3 run is looking really clean. I'd like to see 64-4 get more optimized, though.
Oh true, he did, I hadn't checked. Regarding 64-4, I did make several mistakes in the final gold room, mainly screwing the slope tile jump at the start, 253 can be achieved.
I figured s much. Still, it's a good start.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.27 (20:38)
by eru_bahagon
Congrats Eddy! I was surprised to still see activity around here. I also noted that xaelar took 85-1. Just like ol' times.

You should challenge :)

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.27 (23:57)
by ska
eru_bahagon wrote:Congrats Eddy! I was surprised to still see activity around here. I also noted that xaelar took 85-1. Just like ol' times.

You should challenge :)
This is making me reminisce about the good ol' days, too. I distinctly remember the flurry of route changes and innovations on 85-1 around the time that I took the episode 0th back in the day. Now, of course, that episode run has been smashed by 22 seconds.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.07.28 (10:50)
by EddyMataGallos
Hey thanks eru, nice to see you around. I saw xela's 0th, the other day I was using a different route to try to retake it but it's still a very frustrating level so I stopped it :P
Maybe later haha.

Re: Metanet Highscore 0ths

Posted: 2016.08.31 (10:07)
by vankusss
I cannot play N++ because my graphics card doesn't support OpenGL 3.3. FML

Also, a new poll.

Re: N++ poll

Posted: 2016.09.01 (19:41)
by oxymoron93
Come to discord chat. To see if somehow we can help. Also you will see many familiar people. :)
I guess there is a link somewhere in N++ thread.

Re: N++ poll

Posted: 2016.09.04 (02:24)
by shomman
discord.me/nplusplus

Re: N++ poll

Posted: 2016.09.07 (20:37)
by macrohenry
I started playing some N again, stumbled upon 07-0 and noticed that the route was in great need of improvement. Rerouting yielded more than a second despite the slow ending. I still feel like there's an even better route but I haven't found it yet.

Re: N++ poll

Posted: 2016.09.07 (21:11)
by ska
Nice! That was some really good rerouting!

Re: N++ poll

Posted: 2016.09.07 (22:04)
by MiBeM
Sick run macro! Looks like a great route to me.
When are you getting in on the hot N++ action that's been going on for some time? There's an awesome discord server you should totally join and chat ^^

Re: N++ poll

Posted: 2016.09.08 (21:39)
by macrohenry
MiBeM wrote:Sick run macro! Looks like a great route to me.
When are you getting in on the hot N++ action that's been going on for some time? There's an awesome discord server you should totally join and chat ^^
Not too soon. I'm not that much into N anymore, the next months are going to be very busy and I need to save as much money as possible. :D Had to improve 07-0 though. ;)