Page 1 of 2
oughts
Posted: 2012.06.08 (16:12)
by Paradox
oughts can we have another forum admin?
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.10 (06:14)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
There are not enough question marks in the world for my response.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.10 (18:25)
by otters~1
this is the nominations thread, oughts? cool!
i nominate donfuy
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.10 (23:08)
by Sunset
donfuy 4 pretzels
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.11 (09:08)
by Seneschal
What?
No, Gloomp is the obvious choice. Donfuy is cool and all, but...gloomp.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.11 (13:28)
by Tunco
i am the moist gullible candidate
oily
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.11 (17:39)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
If gloomp and Tunc became admins the forums would surely be subjected to a cryptic sonic assault the likes of which have never heard before (or after, since we will have all been deafened).
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (00:55)
by Donfuy
Seneschal wrote:Gloomp is the obvious choice.
who's Gloomp sorry i dont even
look at me don's not cool cuz Gloomp's the gloomp
the point is Gloomp isn't the gloomp, cuz gloomp is gloomp
i would post more hilarious things but im afraid i'd be 'cooler' than Gloomp, i heard that guy's well cool
(is 'the guy' that you call 'Gloomp' a beer - beers are cool; or else they suck)
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (03:44)
by sidke
i don't even know how you guys are even considering anyone other than gloomp.
you are insulting yourselves and, more importantly, gloomp if you don't support him.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (04:27)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
nevada wrote:i don't even know how you guys are even considering anyone other than gloomp.
you are insulting yourselves and, more importantly, gloomp if you don't support him.
I would have agreed were it not for Donfuy's magnificent Donfuy post in this thread. You can't compete with that.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (08:57)
by Universezero
I nominate myself.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (09:42)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general. There's certainly an active member or two whose elevation to that position I'd be happy to support if doing so would actually improve or revitalise the forums in some way.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (10:26)
by Universezero
I am very active, for all it's worth. I'm also on at times when spammers post and no one else is here, so it makes it very easy for me to get rid of stuff like that before anyone sees it (see: my several months as an unofficial Global Mod).
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (14:22)
by GamingWolf
oughts wrote:This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general. There's certainly an active member or two whose elevation to that position I'd be happy to support if doing so would actually improve or revitalise the forums in some way.
Pretty much this although it's more of a social problem than a technical problem.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (16:32)
by 999_Springs
Poll discrete uniformly distributed now.
Same could go for the individual forum mods. Out of the 16 blue forum moderators, ignoring the two that ^.>.v<^ (that is how you spell it right?) murdered, the median number of posts that each of them has made this year is 2. We could supposedly do with cleaning up about half of them.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (23:38)
by otters~1
Donfuy wrote:Seneschal wrote:Gloomp is the obvious choice.
who's Gloomp sorry i dont even
look at me don's not cool cuz Gloomp's the gloomp
the point is Gloomp isn't the gloomp, cuz gloomp is gloomp
i would post more hilarious things but im afraid i'd be 'cooler' than Gloomp, i heard that guy's well cool
(is 'the guy' that you call 'Gloomp' a beer - beers are cool; or else they suck)
oh man
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.12 (23:52)
by 29403
donfuy or tunc
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.13 (03:41)
by scythe
Wait, we have active members?
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.13 (18:50)
by Donfuy
why is CF in brackets in front of Donfuy please explain
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.14 (00:41)
by GamingWolf
I think the better question is... does UniverseZero know Queen Latifah?
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.14 (11:08)
by Universezero
I'm genuinely insulted, GW. I do a mean impersonation of her. I'd pretty much pass for her if I put on some weight. And was female. And black.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.16 (08:49)
by Keron
oughts wrote:This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general.
Not even Kablizzy? And I know LittleViking never posted very much, but he did lurk a lot in the first board. And whatever happened to blue_tetris, or whatever alias he'd since taken?
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.16 (10:34)
by Universezero
Keron wrote:oughts wrote:This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general.
Not even Kablizzy? And I know LittleViking never posted very much, but he did lurk a lot in the first board. And whatever happened to blue_tetris, or whatever alias he'd since taken?
None of them are particularly active. It's a pretty strong sign of the terrible times this forum is going through.
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.16 (11:19)
by 29403
Come back everyone from metanet.forumer.com
Re: oughts
Posted: 2012.06.16 (19:27)
by Keron
29403 wrote:Come back everyone from metanet.forumer.com
Or rather return to it. lol. It's number one on Google.