Page 1 of 2

oughts

Posted: 2012.06.08 (16:12)
by Paradox
oughts can we have another forum admin?

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.10 (06:14)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
There are not enough question marks in the world for my response.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.10 (18:25)
by otters~1
this is the nominations thread, oughts? cool!

i nominate donfuy

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.10 (23:08)
by Sunset
donfuy 4 pretzels

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.11 (09:08)
by Seneschal
What?

No, Gloomp is the obvious choice. Donfuy is cool and all, but...gloomp.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.11 (13:28)
by Tunco
i am the moist gullible candidate

oily

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.11 (17:39)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
If gloomp and Tunc became admins the forums would surely be subjected to a cryptic sonic assault the likes of which have never heard before (or after, since we will have all been deafened).

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (00:55)
by Donfuy
Seneschal wrote:Gloomp is the obvious choice.
who's Gloomp sorry i dont even

look at me don's not cool cuz Gloomp's the gloomp
the point is Gloomp isn't the gloomp, cuz gloomp is gloomp

i would post more hilarious things but im afraid i'd be 'cooler' than Gloomp, i heard that guy's well cool
(is 'the guy' that you call 'Gloomp' a beer - beers are cool; or else they suck)

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (03:44)
by sidke
i don't even know how you guys are even considering anyone other than gloomp.
you are insulting yourselves and, more importantly, gloomp if you don't support him.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (04:27)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
nevada wrote:i don't even know how you guys are even considering anyone other than gloomp.
you are insulting yourselves and, more importantly, gloomp if you don't support him.
I would have agreed were it not for Donfuy's magnificent Donfuy post in this thread. You can't compete with that.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (08:57)
by Universezero
I nominate myself.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (09:42)
by 乳头的早餐谷物
This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general. There's certainly an active member or two whose elevation to that position I'd be happy to support if doing so would actually improve or revitalise the forums in some way.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (10:26)
by Universezero
I am very active, for all it's worth. I'm also on at times when spammers post and no one else is here, so it makes it very easy for me to get rid of stuff like that before anyone sees it (see: my several months as an unofficial Global Mod).

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (14:22)
by GamingWolf
oughts wrote:This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general. There's certainly an active member or two whose elevation to that position I'd be happy to support if doing so would actually improve or revitalise the forums in some way.
Pretty much this although it's more of a social problem than a technical problem.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (16:32)
by 999_Springs
Poll discrete uniformly distributed now.

Same could go for the individual forum mods. Out of the 16 blue forum moderators, ignoring the two that ^.>.v<^ (that is how you spell it right?) murdered, the median number of posts that each of them has made this year is 2. We could supposedly do with cleaning up about half of them.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (23:38)
by otters~1
Donfuy wrote:
Seneschal wrote:Gloomp is the obvious choice.
who's Gloomp sorry i dont even

look at me don's not cool cuz Gloomp's the gloomp
the point is Gloomp isn't the gloomp, cuz gloomp is gloomp

i would post more hilarious things but im afraid i'd be 'cooler' than Gloomp, i heard that guy's well cool
(is 'the guy' that you call 'Gloomp' a beer - beers are cool; or else they suck)
oh man

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.12 (23:52)
by 29403
donfuy or tunc

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.13 (03:41)
by scythe
Wait, we have active members?

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.13 (18:50)
by Donfuy
why is CF in brackets in front of Donfuy please explain

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.14 (00:41)
by GamingWolf
I think the better question is... does UniverseZero know Queen Latifah?

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.14 (11:08)
by Universezero
I'm genuinely insulted, GW. I do a mean impersonation of her. I'd pretty much pass for her if I put on some weight. And was female. And black.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.16 (08:49)
by Keron
oughts wrote:This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general.
Not even Kablizzy? And I know LittleViking never posted very much, but he did lurk a lot in the first board. And whatever happened to blue_tetris, or whatever alias he'd since taken?

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.16 (10:34)
by Universezero
Keron wrote:
oughts wrote:This silly poll aside, do you think there would be any value in refreshing the admin team? Everyone apart from me is largely inactive, though much the same could be said about the forums in general.
Not even Kablizzy? And I know LittleViking never posted very much, but he did lurk a lot in the first board. And whatever happened to blue_tetris, or whatever alias he'd since taken?
None of them are particularly active. It's a pretty strong sign of the terrible times this forum is going through.

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.16 (11:19)
by 29403
Come back everyone from metanet.forumer.com

Re: oughts

Posted: 2012.06.16 (19:27)
by Keron
29403 wrote:Come back everyone from metanet.forumer.com
Or rather return to it. lol. It's number one on Google.