Forum trouble

Talk about whatever is on your mind, if it doesn't go anywhere else.
Ice Cold
Posts: 221
Joined: 2008.10.07 (02:46)

Postby Sniperwhere » 2009.02.18 (00:27)

Yeah. My forum just opened and it's already got it's first real idiot.

someone had joined, caused problems, ripped the skin, threatened hacking and such. I ended up banning him IP and all and he came back under different names emails and IPs.

I've been forced to admin validate all new accounts because of this. Even reported them to the host.

My question here is, is there any other, more effective way to deal with this? I'm not using wildcards because the IP's change much to drastically for that to work.

I appreciate the help, thanks.

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.02.18 (00:44)

We're actually having some spam problems on the Metanet Forums like you wouldn't believe.

I can only say the best you can do is have a devoted team of administrators and moderators who you can trust.
Loathes

Ice Cold
Posts: 221
Joined: 2008.10.07 (02:46)

Postby Sniperwhere » 2009.02.18 (00:47)

Thankfully I do.


He's seemed to stop since the admin validation, but who knows. I hope he doesn't come back.

User avatar
Bayking
Posts: 318
Joined: 2008.09.27 (19:36)

Postby Animator » 2009.02.18 (03:16)

He's seemed to stop since the admin validation, but who knows. I hope he doesn't come back.
I'd say that's the smartest move.
Image

The 700 Club
Posts: 732
Joined: 2008.11.19 (00:59)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/greenblack
Location: In the land of the jabberwocky

Postby blackbelmoral » 2009.02.18 (03:22)

Sniperwhere wrote:Thankfully I do.


He's seemed to stop since the admin validation, but who knows. I hope he doesn't come back.
maybe hes using proxy ips.
try to find a similarity in usernames if you are unsure
YAR HAR!
Image
X2
Sigs:
29403|?NicNac?| Kablamo
Atilla wrote:If I offer a position, particularly one that requires a degree of responsibility and maturity, verbally abusing me because you missed the position will only confirm my belief that you were not the best candidate

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2009.02.18 (03:35)

Yeah. His most recent was "lololololol." I think we've got it covered, thanks man.
Image

User avatar
Cross-Galactic Train Conducter
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2008.09.27 (00:31)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/T3chno
MBTI Type: ENTJ
Location: foam hands
Contact:

Postby T3chno » 2009.02.18 (03:58)

Why not report to his ISP? I did that once...
Image

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2009.02.19 (06:03)

Techno wrote:Why not report to his ISP? I did that once...
If they're not violating the law, it's in the ISP's interest to protect their customers' privacy. Given that this policy has likely helped you in the past (even if you didn't know it), it's really the best way for them to operate.

As for persistent spammers, the best thing you can do is not to feed the troll.
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

User avatar
Albany, New York
Posts: 521
Joined: 2008.09.28 (02:00)
MBTI Type: INTJ
Location: Inner SE Portland, OR
Contact:

Postby jean-luc » 2009.02.19 (22:33)

scythe33 wrote:
Techno wrote:Why not report to his ISP? I did that once...
If they're not violating the law, it's in the ISP's interest to protect their customers' privacy. Given that this policy has likely helped you in the past (even if you didn't know it), it's really the best way for them to operate.

As for persistent spammers, the best thing you can do is not to feed the troll.
Au contrar... The ISP's interest is avoiding legal trouble, which means dealing with possible abusers promptly. While policy varies by ISP, most ISPs have itchy trigger fingers and will take action against users who are causing spam problems quite willingly. and keep in mind that if the Terms of Service for your forum prohibits spamming, and the user has been notified that his posting is considered spamming in compliance with your ToS, what this person is doing is, in fact, illegal. If you notify the ISP via their proper abuse notification channel (which, 99% of the time, is emailing abuse@[ispdomain]) they will at minimum forward the abuse notification to the customer's billing account, which is probably going to be this kid's parents. If nothing else, the legal notification that an abuse notice constitutes enough of a threat that he'll probably stop. If he doesn't, continue to contact the ISP. If ISPs recieve enough abuse notices about a user, they'll usually start with a phone call, and then go to terminating the account.

If you're really ticked (or legitimately concerned), and the user has made threats of illegal activity ('hacking'), you can report the user to the FBI internet crime center (or your country's equivalent), which will probably not take action against the user, but does keep logs of complaints (so if you're not the only one having problems with him, the FBI-ICC will know and can take appropriate action, which is typically sending abuse notices to the ISP. Of course, being the FBI, their abuse notices have a fair bit more weight than yours). If the user posts anything constituting p0rnography*, then, for your own protection, immediately report it to the FBI and the office your state Attorney General.

*Yes, this is out of style for me. Turns out my school district blocks requests with a certain word in the POST data.
-- I might be stupid, but that's a risk we're going to have to take. --
Image
Website! Photography! Robots! Facebook!
The latest computers from Japan can also perform magical operations.

Ice Cold
Posts: 221
Joined: 2008.10.07 (02:46)

Postby Sniperwhere » 2009.02.19 (23:12)

Well, the problems over now. The guy is gone(hopefully for good) and things have settled down.

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2009.02.20 (09:25)

jean-luc wrote:
scythe33 wrote:
Techno wrote:Why not report to his ISP? I did that once...
If they're not violating the law, it's in the ISP's interest to protect their customers' privacy. Given that this policy has likely helped you in the past (even if you didn't know it), it's really the best way for them to operate.

As for persistent spammers, the best thing you can do is not to feed the troll.
Au contrar... The ISP's interest is avoiding legal trouble, which means dealing with possible abusers promptly. While policy varies by ISP, most ISPs have itchy trigger fingers and will take action against users who are causing spam problems quite willingly. and keep in mind that if the Terms of Service for your forum prohibits spamming, and the user has been notified that his posting is considered spamming in compliance with your ToS, what this person is doing is, in fact, illegal. If you notify the ISP via their proper abuse notification channel (which, 99% of the time, is emailing abuse@[ispdomain]) they will at minimum forward the abuse notification to the customer's billing account, which is probably going to be this kid's parents. If nothing else, the legal notification that an abuse notice constitutes enough of a threat that he'll probably stop. If he doesn't, continue to contact the ISP. If ISPs recieve enough abuse notices about a user, they'll usually start with a phone call, and then go to terminating the account.

If you're really ticked (or legitimately concerned), and the user has made threats of illegal activity ('hacking'), you can report the user to the FBI internet crime center (or your country's equivalent), which will probably not take action against the user, but does keep logs of complaints (so if you're not the only one having problems with him, the FBI-ICC will know and can take appropriate action, which is typically sending abuse notices to the ISP. Of course, being the FBI, their abuse notices have a fair bit more weight than yours). If the user posts anything constituting p0rnography*, then, for your own protection, immediately report it to the FBI and the office your state Attorney General.

*Yes, this is out of style for me. Turns out my school district blocks requests with a certain word in the POST data.
Not so!
Contrary to popular belief, most ISPs actually aren't douchebags (unless it comes to net neutrality). The link between a random forum's ToS and the laws that have been construed to cover it is really dubious at best--as I recall the last time it was used only because the victim had been driven to suicide. As for the porn rule, that's a different ball game, of course, but ISPs usually don't just drop their customers. It would generate tons of bad publicity anyway--can you imagine the headlines that would hit reddit and digg?

Hell, a significant portion of e-mail spam (which ISPs are far, far more concerned about than frivolous forum posting) comes right out of Verizon, and took them until recently to take action and crack down on those users who have become part of a botnet or are otherwise causing damage.

As a pathological example, almost all of the 4channers that tcp flooded scientology.org last year (with a little help from a few skr1pt k1dd33z) didn't bother to hide their IP, and only one was ever caught (I don't even think his ISP was involved; I think they caught him some other way). Rest assured that if they're not disabling accounts after that, there's no way they'll get all up in arms about some little forum.

It would be far too much work for them to bother with that anyway. Trolls almost always get bored within a week. I'd much rather they spend their time improving the quality of their service - and would you just look what Comcast did!

If everyone would stop being so offended, there wouldn't be so many offenders. See how that works?
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1541
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:19)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Huntington, WV
Contact:

Postby Kablizzy » 2009.02.20 (11:42)

You have got the weirdest outlook on everything, dude. Offense really has nothing to do with it - If I've said it prior, I do believe I'll be saying again - Don't act like an asshole, and you won't be treated like an asshole. There are really no two ways about it, in the end. If you're purposefully being a malicious prick, then I see no problem with you being treated as a malicious prick. If everyone would stop being offended, there wouldn't be so many offenders primarily because no one would care if people rape babies. I certainly wouldn't be offended, that's for sure. =D =D =D
Image
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests