Page 1 of 1

Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (04:28)
by capt_weasle
Discuss.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (04:43)
by Radium
Oh god. I can't even answer that.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (04:58)
by Amadeus
Sorry mom.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (05:04)
by bobaganuesh_2
I'd rather get punched in the face on a daily basis.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (11:11)
by Vyacheslav
I'd like to punch her on a daily basis.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (11:43)
by aids
87654321 wrote:I'd like to punch her on a daily basis.
As would I, but I wouldn't.

Hit me with your best shot. Hit me baby one more time.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (11:52)
by lord_day
I would take the hits.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (16:00)
by Kablizzy
Are we talking in the literal or metaphorical sense?

If metaphorical, I spent the first 25 years of my life getting punched in the face daily. Now it's my mom's turn to spend 25 years getting punched in the face daily.

In the literal sense, I'd probably take the blows.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (18:17)
by Tunco
Bam.

It hurts.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (19:40)
by Aldaric
I would punch my mom in the face daily because I can control how hard the punch is.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.14 (21:28)
by t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư
Aldaric wrote:I would punch my mom in the face daily because I can control how hard the punch is.
Took the words right out of my mouth.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (00:21)
by Floor
Tsukatu wrote:
Aldaric wrote:I would punch my mom in the face daily because I can control how hard the punch is.
Took the words right out of my mouth.

QFT. though if if had to be hard, then I'd take it.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (01:33)
by Awesome67
Do we have to choose?

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (02:41)
by Aldaric
DemonzLunchBreak wrote:I just assumed that the punches would all be of a uniform hardness - otherwise it's not much of an ethical question.
Well if that is the case, I would take the punches. Everyday isnt much different than the every other day im getting right now.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (04:09)
by Radium
DemonzLunchBreak wrote:I just assumed that the punches would all be of a uniform hardness - otherwise it's not much of an ethical question.
I assumed it that way. I'd take the punches

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (05:04)
by t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư
DemonzLunchBreak wrote:I just assumed that the punches would all be of a uniform hardness - otherwise it's not much of an ethical question.
There's that saying that I'm in the details.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (12:57)
by blue_tetris
DemonzLunchBreak wrote:I just assumed that the punches would all be of a uniform hardness - otherwise it's not much of an ethical question.
Presumably, if you could control the strength of the punches, then the person punching you could elect not to punch as hard, also. The clear logical solution is that exactly half of the people choose to punch the other half, who elect to be punched; but punch with infinite lightness, such that no actual punching occurs. I do this every hour of every day to everyone around me.

Re: Ethics

Posted: 2009.10.15 (15:53)
by SlappyMcGee
Incidentally, can an admin get on making Awesome67 change his details? They stretch the avatar box for me.