NEW STAR WARS TRILOGY MOTHERFUCKER

Talk about whatever is on your mind, if it doesn't go anywhere else.
User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.23 (17:08)

Loathes

User avatar
Not So Awesome Blossom
Posts: 2529
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:28)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
Location: USA

Postby Vyacheslav » 2010.10.23 (17:14)

Another one? Christ.
Image

User avatar
Damn You're Fine
Posts: 385
Joined: 2008.10.01 (15:36)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/heartattack

Postby Heartattack » 2010.10.23 (17:26)

This is the best news I've had all year :D
spoiler

All sigs thanks to my secret lovers.

I won a contest once.
Tsukatu wrote:ass assass

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2010.10.23 (17:26)

George, drop the stick, and back slowly away from the horse carcass.
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.23 (17:36)

Don't get me wrong, the original trilogy is untouchably great, but the prequel trilogy is also SPECTACULAR, and a new trilogy set in the most exciting part of the expanded universe is great fucking news.
Loathes

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco
MBTI Type: INTJ

Postby smartalco » 2010.10.23 (21:58)

Bets on whether Lucas is absolutely insane and we get another Jar-Jar like character in the first movie?
Image
Tycho: "I don't know why people ever, ever try to stop nerds from doing things. It's really the most incredible waste of time."
Adam Savage: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

User avatar
Subterranean Engineer
Posts: 1694
Joined: 2008.09.26 (16:15)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy
MBTI Type: INTP

Postby Izzy » 2010.10.23 (22:30)

I read the topic as "NSFW STAR WARS TRILOGY MOTHERFUCKER."

*shudder*
Image
Derived from ksktorngsig!
I don't think the universe has infinite material though, unless God makes DLC packs. - SkyPanda

User avatar
Retrofuturist
Posts: 3131
Joined: 2008.09.19 (06:55)
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Postby t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư » 2010.10.23 (22:42)

Goddamnit. I have so lost interest in Star Wars by now.
[spoiler="you know i always joked that it would be scary as hell to run into DMX in a dark ally, but secretly when i say 'DMX' i really mean 'Tsukatu'." -kai]"... and when i say 'scary as hell' i really mean 'tight pink shirt'." -kai[/spoiler][/i]
spoiler

Image


User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2010.10.23 (23:00)

smartalco wrote:Bets on whether Lucas is absolutely insane and we get another Jar-Jar like character in the first movie?
Haha. Ever heard of how the original trilogy was supposed to end?
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco
MBTI Type: INTJ

Postby smartalco » 2010.10.24 (00:53)

scythe wrote:Haha. Ever heard of how the original trilogy was supposed to end?
Nope. Care to enlighten me?
Image
Tycho: "I don't know why people ever, ever try to stop nerds from doing things. It's really the most incredible waste of time."
Adam Savage: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2010.10.24 (04:55)

Well, I read it in a Cracked article. The basic idea is that it was a much less "happy" ending than the one that made it to film.

I can't seem to find the specifics, though.
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.24 (12:44)

scythe wrote:Well, I read it in a Cracked article. The basic idea is that it was a much less "happy" ending than the one that made it to film.

I can't seem to find the specifics, though.

http://io9.com/5611489/original-star-wa ... rikes-back
Kurtz also explains how Return Of The Jedi would have ended originally, in the outline that Lucas and he had come up with before Lucas decided to change everything to make it more of an upbeat toy-selling vehicle. Luke and Leia would have rescued Han Solo from Jabba the Hutt, but then Han would have died halfway through the film, during a raid on an Imperial base. (This is something that Harrison Ford has mentioned before as well.) The film would have ended with the rebel forces in tatters, Leia struggling with her new duties as queen, and Luke walking off into the sunset alone, like Clint Eastwood at the end of a spaghetti Western. It would have been a more nuanced, muted ending to the saga, instead of the Ewoks dancing in the forest like a "teddy-bear luau." (Apparently that genius phrase is the work of the L.A. Times' Geoff Boucher.)
Loathes

User avatar
Depressing
Posts: 1989
Joined: 2008.09.28 (01:10)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/UniverseZero
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/universezero/
MBTI Type: ENTJ
Location: The City of Sails, The Land of the Long White Cloud
Contact:

Postby Universezero » 2010.10.25 (05:54)

They better not fuck up like they did with the Clone Wars. But as said before, I too have lost interest in Star Wars. It's lost the lustre that it once had.
Image

User avatar
Damn You're Fine
Posts: 385
Joined: 2008.10.01 (15:36)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/heartattack

Postby Heartattack » 2010.10.25 (13:25)

Izzy wrote:I read the topic as "NSFW STAR WARS TRILOGY MOTHERFUCKER."

*shudder*
Why would you shudder at that?! I think that's /exactly/ what we need.

Also, I love your new sig and altered avvy.
spoiler

All sigs thanks to my secret lovers.

I won a contest once.
Tsukatu wrote:ass assass

"Asked ortsz for a name change"
Posts: 3380
Joined: 2008.11.13 (16:47)

Postby otters~1 » 2010.10.26 (03:02)

=w= wrote:but the prequel trilogy is also SPECTACULAR
Never once have I seen this word in connection with those movies.

.

This could be good or it could be very, very bad. To me, it depends how they approach the entire project; rather than a heroic, save-the-day blah blah blah everyone lives generic teddy-bear party, they bring Tarantino in to direct and kill a whole bunch of people off. Kind of like what BB and TDK did for Batman.
the dusk the dawn the earth the sea

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.26 (05:14)

Molar-fucking thorax wrote:
=w= wrote:but the prequel trilogy is also SPECTACULAR
Never once have I seen this word in connection with those movies.

.

This could be good or it could be very, very bad. To me, it depends how they approach the entire project; rather than a heroic, save-the-day blah blah blah everyone lives generic teddy-bear party, they bring Tarantino in to direct and kill a whole bunch of people off. Kind of like what BB and TDK did for Batman.

You are my arch-enemy.
Loathes

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco
MBTI Type: INTJ

Postby smartalco » 2010.10.26 (05:23)

Molar-fucking thorax wrote:they bring Tarantino in
This is possibly one of the worst ideas I have ever heard.
Image
Tycho: "I don't know why people ever, ever try to stop nerds from doing things. It's really the most incredible waste of time."
Adam Savage: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.26 (05:24)

=w= wrote:
Molar-fucking thorax wrote: Never once have I seen this word in connection with those movies.

.

This could be good or it could be very, very bad. To me, it depends how they approach the entire project; rather than a heroic, save-the-day blah blah blah everyone lives generic teddy-bear party, they bring Tarantino in to direct and kill a whole bunch of people off. Kind of like what BB and TDK did for Batman.

You are my arch-enemy.

I sat and thought about this and could not leave it at that.

Fuck you!

A) STAR WARS IS ABOUT THE GOOD GUYS HEROICALLY SAVING THE DAY except for THE PREQUEL TRILOGY WHICH INVOLVED DOWN ENDINGS IN ALL THREE FILMS which you apparently do not like.
B) FUCK YOU IN THINKING THAT WHAT STAR WARS NEEDS TO DO IS KILL A BUNCH OF CHARACTERS THAT'S STUPID
C) QUENTIN TARANTINO WHAT
D) BATMAN BEGINS AND THE DARK KNIGHT DIDN'T DO SHIT FOR BATMAN! LOOK AT FUCKING FRANK MILLER 20 YEARS PREVIOUS
E) THE DARK KNIGHT SUCKS
Loathes

User avatar
Depressing
Posts: 1989
Joined: 2008.09.28 (01:10)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/UniverseZero
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/universezero/
MBTI Type: ENTJ
Location: The City of Sails, The Land of the Long White Cloud
Contact:

Postby Universezero » 2010.10.26 (05:41)

While I don't necessarily think that Tarantino would be a good pick, I do agree that making three cheesy fan-wank movies in which the entire audience erupts into applause when a familiar character dramatically struts onto the screen would be a terrible idea. For me, and many others, the old Star Wars years are over. I don't want to see the same thing again. Either they take the movies somewhere new (eg, James Bond, Dark Knight, etc.), or they don't bother.

BONUS CONTENT: IF YOU ARE SLAPPY CLICK HERE
Image

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.26 (06:08)

Universezero wrote:While I don't necessarily think that Tarantino would be a good pick, I do agree that making three cheesy fan-wank movies in which the entire audience erupts into applause when a familiar character dramatically struts onto the screen would be a terrible idea. For me, and many others, the old Star Wars years are over. I don't want to see the same thing again. Either they take the movies somewhere new (eg, James Bond, Dark Knight, etc.), or they don't bother.

BONUS CONTENT: IF YOU ARE SLAPPY CLICK HERE
You also make me sad. Do you love all the movies with high percentage scores on RottenTomatoes, or do you just find the ones that have high percentage scores on RottenTomatoes make your opinions more correct.
Loathes

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2010.10.26 (06:46)

I say, fuck trilogies. They should make as many movies as it takes to make each one tell a good story.

Also, I like Tarantino, but I don't think he'd be a good fit for Star Wars. I mean, yeah, at least the next movie wouldn't be a toy factory.

I would like to see someone die. >:3

I liked The Dark Knight, because of Heath Ledger, and hated it, because of Christian Bale.
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

User avatar
Remembering Hoxygen
Posts: 969
Joined: 2008.09.27 (21:40)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
MBTI Type: INFP
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Postby capt_weasle » 2010.10.26 (22:49)

Universezero wrote:They better not fuck up like they did with the Clone Wars.
General Grievous was my favorite villain of all time until I actually saw him in the movie. BUT it's alright, because he was bad-ass in the Clone Wars mini-episodes made by Genndy Tartakovsky WHICH ARE FUCKING AWESOME.
Image
"How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot: Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resign'd" ~ Alexander Pope
"Boredom is not an appropriate response to exploding cars" ~ Hugh Laurie

"Asked ortsz for a name change"
Posts: 3380
Joined: 2008.11.13 (16:47)

Postby otters~1 » 2010.10.27 (22:01)

=w= wrote:E) THE DARK KNIGHT SUCKS
I was joking ... UNTIL YOU WROTE THIS YOU BASTARD
the dusk the dawn the earth the sea

User avatar
Depressing
Posts: 1989
Joined: 2008.09.28 (01:10)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/UniverseZero
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/universezero/
MBTI Type: ENTJ
Location: The City of Sails, The Land of the Long White Cloud
Contact:

Postby Universezero » 2010.10.28 (20:58)

=w= wrote:You also make me sad. Do you love all the movies with high percentage scores on RottenTomatoes, or do you just find the ones that have high percentage scores on RottenTomatoes make your opinions more correct.
I have no opinion. I'm simply stating that your opinion is the reverse of most of the populace. The point is that Star Wars could be a little less comic-like and more gritty and serious, such as in Casino Royale. Is that a better comparison for you than TDK?
Image

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2010.10.28 (21:13)

Universezero wrote:
=w= wrote:You also make me sad. Do you love all the movies with high percentage scores on RottenTomatoes, or do you just find the ones that have high percentage scores on RottenTomatoes make your opinions more correct.
I have no opinion. I'm simply stating that your opinion is the reverse of most of the populace. The point is that Star Wars could be a little less comic-like and more gritty and serious, such as in Casino Royale. Is that a better comparison for you than TDK?

Bond was way better before they made it serious. And fuck off, most of the populace. Critical consensus very rarely represents the population of Earth. And even then, who cares if my opinion is the reverse of most of the populace? I still think that movie sucks and that you people don't know shit about Batman if you think it's the gritty new edge superheroes were looking for. Comic-book readers across the globe know that we've been dealing with the ramifications of every comic being gritty for twenty years. Thanks, Moore and Miller!
Loathes


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests