Super Bowl

http://nmaps.net/user/eternal_moonlight · Postby **moonlight** » 2011.01.26 (04:32)

Steelers or Packers? I live in Milwaukee, so I am very proud to say, GO PACK!

Discuss.

http://www.nmaps.net/user/Aidiera · Postby **aids** » 2011.01.26 (04:34)

Two of my friends will castrate me if I say the Steelers. Plus I watched The Packers' last game and they seem favored.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Vyacheslav** » 2011.01.26 (04:45)

I'm sick of the Steelers. Go Pack. Also, Rodgers, if he can stay healthy, will be one of the best QBs ever.

http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco · Postby **smartalco** » 2011.01.26 (05:02)

Who do I want to win? Completely don't care. Who do I expect to win? Packers.

http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT · Postby **Tanner** » 2011.01.26 (05:21)

SPORTS

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **capt_weasle** » 2011.01.26 (05:25)

I neither have any pie nor want some. The only good thing the Superbowl does for me is keep customers out of my store so I can be lazy at work for a chance, with the exception of the small rush of to-go orders at half-time.

Postby **t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư** » 2011.01.26 (06:07)

http://nmaps.net/user/gloomp · Postby **unoriginal name** » 2011.01.26 (19:31)

I don't like either of these names, but I'll go with steelers because steel is pretty cool.

Postby **t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư** » 2011.01.26 (20:53)

xVxCrushloaderusSupremusxVx wrote:I don't like either of these names, but I'll go with steelers because steel is pretty cool.

Actually, they're just uneducated thieves.

http://nmaps.net/user/UniverseZero · Postby **Universezero** » 2011.01.26 (22:03)

xVxCrushloaderusSupremusxVx wrote:I don't like either of these names, but I'll go with steelers because steel is pretty cool.

This was exactly the basis I voted on.

Personally, I never liked football that much. They always stop the game too much; needs more constant action, like Rugby.

http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33 · Postby **scythe** » 2011.01.27 (03:21)

I agree with gloomp, because BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW.

http://nmaps.net/user/eternal_moonlight · Postby **moonlight** » 2011.01.27 (04:11)

oeuvre wrote:I'm sick of the Steelers. Go Pack. Also, Rodgers, if he can stay healthy, will be one of the best QBs ever.

Agreed. Also, expect the packers to do good next year with their star tight end and running back returning. Plus many growing players like Sam Sheilds, and James Starks.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Vyacheslav** » 2011.01.27 (05:15)

Starks=last year's Shonn Greene.

http://nmaps.net/user/eternal_moonlight · Postby **moonlight** » 2011.01.28 (04:30)

oeuvre wrote:Starks=last year's Shonn Greene.

Yeah. With Ryan Grant back next year, it will definatly be a LT Shonn Green type of thing.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **capt_weasle** » 2011.01.28 (18:02)

T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:

Some of my friends were talking about Bob Marley when a mutual acquaintance walked up, asking who they were talking about. When they told him, he asked who Bob Marley was because he hadn't heard of him, to the surprise of everyone else.

"Wait, so you don't know who Bob Marley is!?"
"No, I don't really watch football."

Postby **t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư** » 2011.01.28 (18:19)

capt_weasle wrote:Some of my friends were talking about Bob Marley when a mutual acquaintance walked up, asking who they were talking about. When they told him, he asked who Bob Marley was because he hadn't heard of him, to the surprise of everyone else.

"Wait, so you don't know who Bob Marley is!?"
"No, I don't really watch football."

This is something I do all the time, intentionally. That is, when someone makes a reference to some kind of sport, I comment that I don't watch a totally different one ("The World Series is coming up." "Oh, I don't watch hockey.")

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **capt_weasle** » 2011.01.28 (20:37)

Unfortunately, this guy was completely serious. The rest of the day they were making quips like, "I hear that the Beatles have the best defense in the NFL."

Postby **otters~1** » 2011.01.29 (04:06)

T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:

Those are both men.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Vyacheslav** » 2011.01.29 (04:11)

Problem, Nostromo?

Postby **otters~1** » 2011.01.29 (04:56)

oeuvre wrote:Problem, Nostromo?

To me, it opens the comic up to a whole new level of interpretation.

http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT · Postby **Tanner** » 2011.01.29 (05:28)

Nostromo wrote:
oeuvre wrote:Problem, Nostromo?
To me, it opens the comic up to a whole new level of interpretation.

Which level of interpretation might that be?

http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy · Postby **Kablizzy** » 2011.01.29 (06:24)

hairscapades wrote:
Nostromo wrote:
oeuvre wrote:Problem, Nostromo?
To me, it opens the comic up to a whole new level of interpretation.
Which level of interpretation might that be?

The one with gays.

Also, Pavel - Who is the chick in your sig? The one in grey? I've gotta know, it's been bugging me for months.

http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33 · Postby **scythe** » 2011.01.29 (07:35)

JUICE SPRINGSTEEN wrote:
Also, Pavel - Who is the chick in your sig? The one in grey? I've gotta know, it's been bugging me for months.

I, um, he, um, uses a random image tool.

"http://a.random-image.net/handler.aspx? ... m=917.1113"

http://www.nmaps.net/user/Yahoozy · Postby **yahoozy** » 2011.01.29 (07:43)

scythe wrote:
JUICE SPRINGSTEEN wrote:
Also, Pavel - Who is the chick in your sig? The one in grey? I've gotta know, it's been bugging me for months.
I, um, he, um, uses a random image tool.

"http://a.random-image.net/handler.aspx? ... m=917.1113"

How is this relevant to Kablizzy's question?

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Vyacheslav** » 2011.01.29 (14:54)

This one? Eva Wyrwal.

Metanet Forums

Super Bowl

Super Bowl

Who is online