Page 1 of 2
					
				Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (04:32)
				by moonlight
				Steelers or Packers? I live in Milwaukee, so I am very proud to say, GO PACK!
Discuss.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (04:34)
				by aids
				Two of my friends will castrate me if I say the Steelers. Plus I watched The Packers' last game and they seem favored.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (04:45)
				by Vyacheslav
				I'm sick of the Steelers. Go Pack. Also, Rodgers, if he can stay healthy, will be one of the best QBs ever.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (05:02)
				by smartalco
				Who do I want to win?  Completely don't care.  Who do I expect to win?  Packers.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (05:21)
				by Tanner
				SPORTS
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (05:25)
				by capt_weasle
				I neither have any pie nor want some. The only good thing the Superbowl does for me is keep customers out of my store so I can be lazy at work for a chance, with the exception of the small rush of to-go orders at half-time.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (06:07)
				by t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (19:31)
				by unoriginal name
				I don't like either of these names, but I'll go with steelers because steel is pretty cool.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (20:53)
				by t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư
				xVxCrushloaderusSupremusxVx wrote:I don't like either of these names, but I'll go with steelers because steel is pretty cool.
Actually, they're just uneducated thieves.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.26 (22:03)
				by Universezero
				xVxCrushloaderusSupremusxVx wrote:I don't like either of these names, but I'll go with steelers because steel is pretty cool.
This was exactly the basis I voted on.
Personally, I never liked football that much. They always stop the game too much; needs more constant action, like Rugby.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.27 (03:21)
				by scythe
				I agree with gloomp, because BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.27 (04:11)
				by moonlight
				oeuvre wrote:I'm sick of the Steelers. Go Pack. Also, Rodgers, if he can stay healthy, will be one of the best QBs ever.
Agreed. Also, expect the packers to do good next year with their star tight end and running back returning. Plus many growing players like Sam Sheilds, and James Starks.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.27 (05:15)
				by Vyacheslav
				Starks=last year's Shonn Greene.
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.28 (04:30)
				by moonlight
				oeuvre wrote:Starks=last year's Shonn Greene.
Yeah. With Ryan Grant back next year, it will definatly be a LT Shonn Green type of thing.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.28 (18:02)
				by capt_weasle
				T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:
 
Some of my friends were talking about Bob Marley when a mutual acquaintance walked up, asking who they were talking about. When they told him, he asked who Bob Marley was because he hadn't heard of him, to the surprise of everyone else.
"Wait, so you don't know who Bob Marley is!?"
"No, I don't really watch football."
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.28 (18:19)
				by t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư
				capt_weasle wrote:Some of my friends were talking about Bob Marley when a mutual acquaintance walked up, asking who they were talking about. When they told him, he asked who Bob Marley was because he hadn't heard of him, to the surprise of everyone else.
"Wait, so you don't know who Bob Marley is!?"
"No, I don't really watch football."
This is something I do all the time, intentionally. That is, when someone makes a reference to some kind of sport, I comment that I don't watch a totally different one ("The World Series is coming up." "Oh, I don't watch hockey.")
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.28 (20:37)
				by capt_weasle
				Unfortunately, this guy was completely serious. The rest of the day they were making quips like, "I hear that the Beatles have the best defense in the NFL."
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (04:06)
				by otters~1
				T̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư wrote:
 
Those are both men.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (04:11)
				by Vyacheslav
				Problem, Nostromo?
			 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (04:56)
				by otters~1
				oeuvre wrote:Problem, Nostromo?
To me, it opens the comic up to a whole new level of interpretation.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (05:28)
				by Tanner
				Nostromo wrote:oeuvre wrote:Problem, Nostromo?
To me, it opens the comic up to a whole new level of interpretation.
 
Which level of interpretation might that be?
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (06:24)
				by Kablizzy
				hairscapades wrote:Nostromo wrote:oeuvre wrote:Problem, Nostromo?
To me, it opens the comic up to a whole new level of interpretation.
 
Which level of interpretation might that be?
 
The one with gays.
Also, Pavel - Who is the chick in your sig? The one in grey? I've gotta know, it's been bugging me for months.
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (07:35)
				by scythe
				JUICE SPRINGSTEEN wrote:
Also, Pavel - Who is the chick in your sig? The one in grey? I've gotta know, it's been bugging me for months.
I, um, he, um, uses a random image tool.
"
http://a.random-image.net/handler.aspx? ... m=917.1113"
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (07:43)
				by  yahoozy
				
How is this relevant to Kablizzy's question?
 
			
					
				Re: Super Bowl
				Posted: 2011.01.29 (14:54)
				by Vyacheslav
				 
This one? Eva Wyrwal.