Metanet Forums

Okay - so the last two threads faded quick.
(Second one original)
I have a new solution - that you have a list of active people on wait, and a seperate thread for sign-ups.
When someone signs up, I put that person on a pm to someone, or who they want.
They pm each other/comment on maps.
This way, the people can sign up for mentoring, and know they are being mentored, not to mention the fact that when you see someone with less than 5 maps, or really basic maps, you can (nicely) give them a link to this thread.
This will help it run smoothly, and I am only making sure active members are mentoring, so no complaints from the people about not seeing their mentors.
Sign ups to be a mentor start NOW! so submit an app (post on this thread).
Also - please only join if you are active on therealn and visit numa regularily.
Active constitutes as coming, scrolling through topics/maps, etc. Not necesarily posting.
This will be better organized.


Cool!

Sign up!

1.

Sign up thread to be completed soon. completed.

If I'm not mistaken, your other two threads have fallen off the page. Do you know what that means? It means that people aren't interested. So why in the name of fucking God do you decide to make TWO MORE FUCKING THREADS???

GAAAAHHHH

Laurie wrote:If I'm not mistaken, your other two threads have fallen off the page. Do you know what that means? It means that people aren't interested. So why in the name of fucking God do you decide to make TWO MORE FUCKING THREADS???

GAAAAHHHH

If you read the other two threads, you would see why:
people forget to commit themselves. people liked it, but no one did anything.
I hope to have fixed this problem.
Now, if you have a problem, please file a complaint in a pm. Otherwise, stop.
If someone else says this, and really means it, then I'll take you seriously.
But,in the meantime, you have been doing this on every thread that happens.
Cut.
It.
Out.

~Rhekatou

If I'm not mistaken, your other two threads have fallen off the page. Do you know what that means? It means that people aren't interested. So why in the name of fucking God do you decide to make TWO MORE FUCKING THREADS???

GAAAAHHHH

(I mean it too)

gloomp wrote:If I'm not mistaken, your other two threads have fallen off the page. Do you know what that means? It means that people aren't interested. So why in the name of fucking God do you decide to make TWO MORE FUCKING THREADS???

GAAAAHHHH

(I mean it too)

Haha.
You hate me too,
like a mini Laurie.

Anyhows:

KlanKaos wrote:Great idea. I'm for sure in as a mentor.

So we just search through and find a new mapper that could use some help, and help them? Sounds fun.

Bionic Cryionic wrote: want in! It could help to make noobs average mapmakers, and then they won't be noobs! They can even be pros if they try hard...

Avarin wrote:I do it because I believe the relationship provides something for both the older member and the newer member.

Clovic wrote:Sign up to mentor, sign up to be mentored. Without willing participants both ways, the project will not work. We need a way to recruit people wanting to be mentored, and then we need to match the veterans up with them systematically.

I am using his suggestion.

Qwubble wrote:I think it's a great thing to do,

Even you said some things Laurie,

Laurie wrote:I'll help out if I can find someone.

Rhekatou wrote:...people liked it, but no one did anything.

blackbelmoral in [url=http://forum.therealn.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=1032&st=0&sk=t&sd=a]the past thread[/url]. wrote:this is turning into epic failure

Yes.
I did say that.
But that was because people were forgetting...

In the past thread, Laurie wrote: Don't give up, soldier! You're doing a great thing!

I think that I said that before you made a bajillion other threads about the same damn thing.

If you so fucking want this thing to happen, revive the original thread. Don't create a bunch of new ones. Do you honestly think people won't be annoyed by having their forum cluttered up with irritating spam? You actually had a good idea, I'll grant, but you've totally fucked it up. If I didn't know you already, I might try to be nicer with this next bit, but I know how you are. So here's what I say you do: If you really care about this concept, hand it over to someone who's learned to use their head-mush.


Byyyyyyyy the way, mini-Laurie? I'd think you'd call me mega-Laurie, considering our history.

Laurie wrote:I think that I said that before you made a bajillion other threads about the same damn thing.

TWO.

*Doesn't even comment on gloomp, shakes head.*
Just rain on someone elses parade?
And if you don't like it, you don't have to comment.
And laurie, stop spamming me with pms that say "blah" a million times.
If i continued to do what you are doing, someone would ban me.
So go, and commit suicide.
That, or stop flaming on my thread and ruining a perfectly good topic.

Rhekatou wrote:And laurie, stop spamming me with pms that say "blah" a million times.

Just like you did to sidke, except instead of blah you said fuck.

Please, someone lock this because this is turning into a spamfest.

Laurie wrote:

Rhekatou wrote:And laurie, stop spamming me with pms that say "blah" a million times.

Just like you did to sidke, except instead of blah you said fuck.

Please, someone lock this because this is turning into a spamfest.

That was your goal in the first place, wasn't it.
And you are turning it inot that.

And, I said that to sidke because I had a reason: he was mindlessly banning me just to make you laugh, gloomp.

Laurie wrote:Please, someone lock this because this is turning into a spamfest.

And all three of you are contributing to it. Take the destructive criticism to PMs.

Although I agree with gloomp: I'd recommend reviving the original thread and stating that you'd like to start it again. Of course, there's better ways to convey that message than the way he did.

The goddamn point we're making is that it isn't a good thread. The original was good, but this isn't. There's no good reason for it to exist.

Anyway, yeah. This should be locked. I don't want to actually really snap.

Calcy wrote:

Laurie wrote:Please, someone lock this because this is turning into a spamfest.

And all three of you are contributing to it. Take the destructive criticism to PMs.

Although I agree with gloomp: I'd recommend reviving the original thread and stating that you'd like to start it again. Of course, there's better ways to convey that message than the way he did.

But when it is already remade, is there a point in destroying it :?

gloomp wrote:The goddamn point we're making is that it isn't a good thread. The original was good, but this isn't. There's no good reason for it to exist..

Agreed. I'll lock this for now. Rhekatou, feel free to revive the first thread, or PM me or any of the other mods if anything else comes up.

Rhekatou wrote:But when it is already remade, is there a point in destroying it :?

I'm not destroying it, I'm just preventing it from disintegrating any farther than it already has.