Page 1 of 2
This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (21:36)
by unoriginal name
Discuss.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (21:36)
by T3chno
First response to 6000th thread.
This calls for a celebration. Party at Leaff's place.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (21:37)
by Leaff
woooooooooooo
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (23:15)
by Donfuy
Perfect topic of conversation for the 6000th thread:
gloomp's new sig.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (23:29)
by Izzy
DONFUY wrote:Perfect topic of conversation for the 6000th thread:
gloomp's new sig.
That guy Izzy made it. :I
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (23:37)
by Vyacheslav
It's smexy.
Congrats to #6,000
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.26 (23:38)
by T3chno
Izzy wrote:DONFUY wrote:Perfect topic of conversation for the 6000th thread:
gloomp's new sig.
That guy Izzy made it. :I
Needs more lens flare.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (02:54)
by moonlight
I love your sig, gloomp.
Congrats on 6000.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (08:18)
by aids
How does this warrant a thread? I'm not trying to be a buzzkill, but why has our community fallen so hard that we need to talk about the number of threads we have? I'm getting tired of the lack of sustenance in our forums. Somebody needs to defibrillate us, and soon.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (08:47)
by origami_alligator
How does this warrant a thread? I'm not trying to be a buzzkill, but why has our community fallen so hard that we need to talk about the number of COCKS we have? I'm getting tired of the lack of sustenance in our forums. Somebody needs to defibrillate us, and soon.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (08:53)
by Spawn of Yanni
How does this warrant a thread? I'm not trying to be a buzzkill, but why has our COCKS fallen so hard that we need to talk about the number of COCKS we have? I'm getting tired of the lack of sustenance in our forums. Somebody needs to defibrillate us, and soon.
That is to say, there's no reason why we can't point this out. Did we point out 5000? No. But no one (um, maybe you) would have complained. Should we do this every 1000 topics? Eh, probably not. But to quote a dude who used to hang around here, chiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill
Edit: Jesus, quit with this how low can our community go bullshit. I thought we'd gotten past that whole deal.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (10:28)
by Seneschal
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (13:26)
by Vyacheslav
Congrats to atob and the rest of the Metanet community who have made maps! Exeception: Those who spammed/multiaccounted and sniped. So that probably leaves about 7 people...
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (14:41)
by Donfuy
Techno wrote:Izzy wrote:DONFUY wrote:Perfect topic of conversation for the 6000th thread:
gloomp's new sig.
That guy Izzy made it. :I
Needs more lens flare.
NEEDZ EVEN MORE CONTRAZTZORZ
And I totally agree with Yanni!
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (14:51)
by fawk
6000th thread. That explains the huge 200000 written over the banner, right?
EDIT: Okay.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (16:06)
by Pheidippides
But the board index says we only have 4711 threads... I'm confused.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (16:16)
by Spawn of Yanni
Prolly doesn't count deleted threads. Same reason why it says we have 1622 members but the newest one is #5086.
(edit: Oh, in case I misunderstood: gloomp is calling this the 6000th thread due to the t=6000 in the url)
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (16:37)
by Pheidippides
Spawn of Yanni wrote:Prolly doesn't count deleted threads. Same reason why it says we have 1622 members but the newest one is #5086.
(edit: Oh, in case I misunderstood: gloomp is calling this the 6000th thread due to the t=6000 in the url)
Ah, that makes sense. But wow, that means we've deleted a ton of topics and even more members. o,O
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (16:52)
by Spawn of Yanni
Pheidippides wrote:Spawn of Yanni wrote:Prolly doesn't count deleted threads. Same reason why it says we have 1622 members but the newest one is #5086.
(edit: Oh, in case I misunderstood: gloomp is calling this the 6000th thread due to the t=6000 in the url)
Ah, that makes sense. But wow, that means we've deleted a ton of topics and even more members. o,O
Mm, I'd guess that at least 95% of it is down to spambots (and the topics they create).
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (17:07)
by Pheidippides
Spawn of Yanni wrote:Mm, I'd guess that at least 95% of it is down to spambots (and the topics they create).
That's what I figured too, but that's a lot of spambots. I didn't realize our little infestation problem was that bad. Guess that means it's being handled well. ;)
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.27 (20:48)
by otters~1
why has our COCKS fallen so hard
as sidke said, n e e d m o r e g i r l s
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.28 (00:51)
by Vyacheslav
type cocks, folks.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.28 (01:12)
by OneSevenNine
DONFUY wrote:gloomp's new sig.
Gloomp we can believe in.
Also, cocks.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.28 (02:31)
by rocket_thumped
DONFUY wrote:NEEDZ EVEN MORE CONTRAZTZORZ
And I totally agree with Yanni!
Your avatar is destroying me.
Re: This is our 6000th thread.
Posted: 2010.05.28 (06:55)
by SlappyMcGee
Pheidippides wrote:Spawn of Yanni wrote:Mm, I'd guess that at least 95% of it is down to spambots (and the topics they create).
That's what I figured too, but that's a lot of spambots. I didn't realize our little infestation problem was that bad. Guess that means it's being handled well. ;)
The Magician's Secrets:
We don't delete a lot of the stupid threads you guys make! We just move them into a secret subforum that nobody can see but us! That way, if whoever did it was wrong, we can go back on that shit.