Metanet 0ths Thread

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.25 (22:05)

TheRealOne wrote:Very nice runs. 5-0 is a much better Christmas present to wake up to than 2-0 =P Also 1 frame shy of macro on -1 nice. I think the top part needs a new route and then there may be quite a bit left, but who knows where the drones will be if you make the top a lot faster.

thx :)
I did that 54-1 a while ago and i thought about making it faster for quite some time, didn't find anything useful :( you would need somehow beat the drones

55-3 - another crappi ex-0th, 12 left!

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.12.26 (02:07)

Damn another crappi bites the dust. Going to take -1 for the ownage next?

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.26 (10:38)

TheRealOne wrote:Damn another crappi bites the dust. Going to take -1 for the ownage next?

I played it a little but the drones are just too annoying.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.26 (13:41)

ep 50 - contains 0th on -0, -1 and tie on -4; overall it's 10 frames behind level 0ths :P

http://nmaps.net/user/EddyMataGallos · Postby **EddyMataGallos** » 2010.12.26 (13:59)

vankusss wrote:ep 50 - contains 0th on -0, -1 and tie on -4; overall it's 10 frames behind level 0ths :P

OMG fastest episode

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.12.26 (16:28)

vankusss wrote:ep 50 - contains 0th on -0, -1 and tie on -4; overall it's 10 frames behind level 0ths :P

Holy shit! 10 frames shy of a perfect EP, and you tied crappi on -1. Wow! The only slightly funny thing is that you don't have ownage. -3 is a tough level, probably only a few frames left with the current ending.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.27 (12:02)

heh thx i hoped you'll like it :) i would have had gotten tried a perfect ep, but -2 sucks so much, not to mention -3

EDIT: but still, 50-3 is easy if you're crazy enough for that ANGERFIST's rcj, then you need just 2 jumps and you'll win by a significant margin

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.27 (18:36)

58-4 by 1 frame - innovated the lp chamber, 54-2, 42-4 (spot the difference!)

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.12.27 (18:59)

vankusss wrote:42-4 (spot the difference!)

Change the cj to an rcj and save .175 easy as that. lol.

EDIT: see if you can do anything my 58-1 innovations in post an innovation.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.27 (20:13)

TheRealOne wrote:EDIT: see if you can do anything my 58-1 innovations in post an innovation.

as i said, not really my cup of tea :)
41-3
EDIT: 46-1 with simple innov

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.28 (10:20)

Me and TRO proudly present,
61-2 with 3.725 seconds lead. Yeah that's right.

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Raif** » 2010.12.28 (10:48)

vankusss wrote:Me and TRO proudly present,
61-2 with 3.725 seconds lead. Yeah that's right.

O____O

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.28 (13:29)

65-3, 60-1, 62-4

EDIT: 62-2
EDIT2: improved 61-2, now it's full 4.025 seconds faster than old 0th (the lead is now only 3.5 since ska got a top-20)

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.12.28 (21:21)

vankusss wrote:Me and TRO proudly present,
61-2 with 3.725 seconds lead. Yeah that's right.

vankusss wrote:65-3, 60-1, 62-4

EDIT: 62-2
EDIT2: improved 61-2, now it's full 4.025 seconds faster than old 0th (the lead is now only 3.5 since ska got a top-20)

Ha! 4 seconds faster =P That run is awesome. Your ending got so much cleaner in this one too. You got the speed perfect in the final ascent. Also you are own the 60s column right now. Keep em coming :D

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.29 (14:34)

Thx TRO :P and for your route help, too.
Keeping them coming:
64-1; 19-0 by 0.7 with the route I showed in 'post an innovation'
innovated further 46-1 which was taken by xaelar, 65-3 might be too clean for me, i'll probably try 41-3 later

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **eru_bahagon** » 2010.12.29 (21:54)

19-0 is just amazing. So clean, close dodges and sweet bounce-block jump. I love.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2010.12.29 (23:13)

eru_bahagon wrote:19-0 is just amazing. So clean, close dodges and sweet bounce-block jump. I love.

Heh thx. You didn't write for quite a while on forums.
19-3

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2010.12.30 (00:06)

vankusss wrote:
eru_bahagon wrote:19-0 is just amazing. So clean, close dodges and sweet bounce-block jump. I love.
Heh thx. You didn't write for quite a while on forums.
19-3

It seems your run didn't get submit to the Metanet boards, but it did get on the NRreality boards. Which is funny because the only other run that I have seen do that was Gutland's 19-2, same episode is funny. I wonder if there is some abnormality in NReality's code. Or it is just a coincidence.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2011.01.02 (16:10)

TheRealOne wrote:It seems your run didn't get submit to the Metanet boards, but it did get on the NRreality boards. Which is funny because the only other run that I have seen do that was Gutland's 19-2, same episode is funny. I wonder if there is some abnormality in NReality's code. Or it is just a coincidence.

Hmm I never play in legit mode and when I submitted it it appeared on the metanet boards, too. I sumitted it again so can you see it now or still not?

EDIT: 90-2 with new route, 91-3

EDIT2: 86-4, 86-0 (that level scares me)

EDIT3: corrected typo

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2011.01.05 (16:39)

improved 29-2 0th to 1.050 seconds over johnny_faneca.

for reference:
109.550 => 109.650 => 109.975

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2011.01.06 (12:53)

heh 1 frame from 110, unlucky, still nice
39-3 was fun, my guess is like 5-8 frames left, because you are limited by the laser

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2011.01.10 (00:14)

36-0, 37-1, 33-1, 66-3, 64-0, 14-4, 23-2, 65-4, tied 98-1, ep 23, ep 64

passed xaelar

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2011.01.10 (03:33)

vankusss wrote:passed xaelar

That's what most of the community has been waiting for. For years.

:O

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2011.01.10 (05:50)

vankusss wrote:36-0, 37-1, 33-1, 66-3, 64-0, 14-4, 23-2, 65-4, tied 98-1, ep 23, ep 64

passed xaelar

The king has officially been dethroned.
Nice runs; particularly your episode runs... they are impeccably clean.. Episode 64 would do my head in... especially with that last level... you were millimeters from accidentally touching the exit... yikes!

http://nmaps.net/user/ · Postby **Raif** » 2011.01.10 (11:37)

vankusss wrote:36-0, 37-1, 33-1, 66-3, 64-0, 14-4, 23-2, 65-4, tied 98-1, ep 23, ep 64

passed xaelar

:O
Awesome. Congrats

Metanet Forums

Metanet 0ths Thread

How many votes will this poll get?

Who is online