<~Hawking> God did not create the Universe

[amomentlikethis]

Science cannot disprove religion...

I don't agree with the implications of that statement.
In my mind that's like saying colour cannot disprove sound. It's trivial, and stupid.

Science doesn't disprove religion because science doesn't need to disprove religion. The foundation of science is factual, whereas the foundation of religion is clouded history.

[SlappyMcGee]

Science cannot disprove religion...

I don't agree with the implications of that statement.
In my mind that's like saying colour cannot disprove sound. It's trivial, and stupid.

Science doesn't disprove religion because science doesn't need to disprove religion. The foundation of science is factual, whereas the foundation of religion is clouded history.

Did you read the rest of the sentence. :/ Because you misunderstood the context. It was because the OP stated that science could not disprove religion, which I concurred as being factual.

[amomentlikethis]

...you misunderstood the context.

It seems I did!