Moderators: EddyMataGallos, TheRealOne
Not at all!Tempus wrote:Ahhh sorry if this is a tad late, just-just encountered this contest... mind if I hop in?
Edit for pastebin: http://paste.droni.es/22a057595048649d65f38e86 (Which doesn't seem to be working?)
Retile:
Reject:
<Uuni> i dont see the escape in religion
Sure thing.Scrivener wrote:Hey.... paste was broken and I went on a walk in the woods all day with my family for father's day, can you please judge me?
http://www.nmaps.net/229382
http://www.nmaps.net/229383
EDIT: To clarify, "Paste as Edit" isn't working so there's no reason to make a paste out of this right now.
<Uuni> i dont see the escape in religion
Wow, sincerelly, that sounds superb. It is a really interesting idea for the competition!Scrivener wrote:You know what would take this to the next level?
The map for each round should be the winning map from the previous round. Then we keep track of all the winning maps and have a super long retile/reobject chain of awesome maps.
Admittedly, I considered doing that, but then I realised that I'd only be doing judging...zoasBE wrote:Wow, sincerelly, that sounds superb. It is a really interesting idea for the competition!Scrivener wrote:You know what would take this to the next level?
The map for each round should be the winning map from the previous round. Then we keep track of all the winning maps and have a super long retile/reobject chain of awesome maps.
You can finish Round 4 and Round 5 as you're doing currently and then we have a winner, and for the next set of rounds when scores are reset to zero again start as script said. Really interesting thing.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, I don't think that would work out too well. That is, if you're still aiming to have five-round blocks, it would actually be unfair to the winners -- they'd have one less chance to score points, yeah? And if, say, script and Meta kept alternating wins, they'd end up losing horribly...ChrisE wrote:Admittedly, I considered doing that, but then I realised that I'd only be doing judging...
UNLESS the person who submits the highest-scoring pair becomes the new judge?
Yeah, the judging would have to be altered accordingly. I will make a poll after the end of the next round and see where it takes us.Tempus wrote:Unless I'm misunderstanding, I don't think that would work out too well. That is, if you're still aiming to have five-round blocks, it would actually be unfair to the winners -- they'd have one less chance to score points, yeah? And if, say, script and Meta kept alternating wins, they'd end up losing horribly...ChrisE wrote:Admittedly, I considered doing that, but then I realised that I'd only be doing judging...
UNLESS the person who submits the highest-scoring pair becomes the new judge?
In case that was incoherent, an example of a five-round block:
script: 30 + 0 + 30 + 0 + 30 = 90
Meta: 25 + 30 + 0 + 30 + 0 - 85
Me: 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 100
Oh! Potential solution -- we use the average of the scores, not the total. That would be much more fair. And this is assuming everyone is on board to judge now and again, of course. How's that sound?
The same way as script was suggesting something I was suggesting something more as well.ChrisE wrote:Oh, and zoas, it's my competition and I'll do what I like.
Fortunately I like script's idea.
I don't know if it's poor English, but it comes across as though you're telling me what to do.zoasBE wrote:You can finish Round 4 and Round 5 as you're doing currently and then we have a winner, and for the next set of rounds when scores are reset to zero again start as script said. Really interesting thing.
From Streetsahead
From elhombredelsombrero (Traveleravi)
From Aidiera
Also from Aidiera
From Traveleravi
Izzy and TRO - #n-highscores: <@Izzy> Where'd those frames come from? | <TRO> meta's ninja runs faster | <@Izzy> He stole TFK'S?!
Life247 - #n-highscores: Grrr, you're too perfect Meta.
Pryocheese - this map: of course you'd figure out how to cheat anti-cheat methods
Kablizzy: Click
kkstrong: I fully expect him to sig that.
TOO BAD!
That would be pretty hilarious, actually.Tempus wrote:And if, say, script and Meta kept alternating wins, they'd end up losing horribly...
In case that was incoherent, an example of a five-round block:
script: 30 + 0 + 30 + 0 + 30 = 90
Meta: 25 + 30 + 0 + 30 + 0 - 85
Me: 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 100
Izzy and TRO - #n-highscores: <@Izzy> Where'd those frames come from? | <TRO> meta's ninja runs faster | <@Izzy> He stole TFK'S?!
Life247 - #n-highscores: Grrr, you're too perfect Meta.
Pryocheese - this map: of course you'd figure out how to cheat anti-cheat methods
Kablizzy: Click
kkstrong: I fully expect him to sig that.
TOO BAD!
<Uuni> i dont see the escape in religion
From Streetsahead
From elhombredelsombrero (Traveleravi)
From Aidiera
Also from Aidiera
From Traveleravi
Izzy and TRO - #n-highscores: <@Izzy> Where'd those frames come from? | <TRO> meta's ninja runs faster | <@Izzy> He stole TFK'S?!
Life247 - #n-highscores: Grrr, you're too perfect Meta.
Pryocheese - this map: of course you'd figure out how to cheat anti-cheat methods
Kablizzy: Click
kkstrong: I fully expect him to sig that.
TOO BAD!
<Uuni> i dont see the escape in religion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
