Metanet 0ths Thread

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.03 (16:07)

56-0 with a little innov, much better time is possible with it

http://nmaps.net/user/golfkid · Postby **golf** » 2009.12.03 (17:35)

94-2, broke a 5-way tied for 0th.

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2009.12.03 (19:00)

vankusss wrote:56-0 with a little innov, much better time is possible with it

golfkid wrote:94-2, broke a 5-way tied for 0th.

2 more 0ths over to nreality :D. Nice work the both of you.

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.04 (02:00)

51-4 taken by 10 frames, and is still at /least/ 20 frames improvable, judging by -1 gold runs.

I just noticed that Seifer took 24-1 by a frame. Schweet, making KryX biet yoar dust.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.04 (12:35)

Izzy wrote:51-4 taken by 10 frames, and is still at /least/ 20 frames improvable, judging by -1 gold runs.

I just noticed that Seifer took 24-1 by a frame. Schweet, making KryX biet yoar dust.

taken by 17 frames
Seifer's 24-1 is awesome, i wonder if he noticed this topic
EDIT: 6-1 wooo

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.04 (22:51)

47-0 by 12 frames

Postby **Unreality** » 2009.12.05 (08:57)

vankusss you are awesome ...

Are those existing metanet highscore 0th's really that imperfect? :p it seems that you destroy them with ease.

I hope xaelar can play more :p

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.05 (20:37)

Unreality wrote:vankusss you are awesome ...

Are those existing metanet highscore 0th's really that imperfect? :p it seems that you destroy them with ease.

I hope xaelar can play more :p

well, thx
I don't think they are imperfect. Actually, every time i watch any 0th i think it's perfect, because it looks so. That's why i only watch 0th runs only to get the route, otherwise i risk to be scared of the cleanness of the run and give up. So i just learn the route and try it again again, improving, hopefully taking it. I experienced a situation like this few times on n-highscores irc: " me: took xy-z 0th " " others: lol it looks slower/less clean then the previous 0th ", usually i make some really visible flaws :/
And 'ease' isn't the right word. Most of the 0ths i have weren't done in 1 day, that means that i play it for a hour one day, then try it next day, then next day, atp. This way every new day it get's easier and i 'learn' some parts of the level, so i can get more good demos in less time. (but if you meant 'with ease' as a comparison to casual players, then yes, but n isn't actually a hard game, it just needs training and a lot of time (a lot of time to get good at it, then it is mainly about number of tries (and here comes the solution why there are so little hs-ers nowadays, because most of people get bored after trying the level for example for 30 minutes (like Meta :P - i'm kind of using his own words from the time i asked him why he doesn't hs more) /* hmm now i have to close all brackets lol */ ))) /* done */
And i hope xela has more time, too :/ (i believe he will get more active with blur starting again or Christmas holidays coming).

http://nmaps.net/user/xaelar · Postby **xaelar** » 2009.12.06 (03:48)

I don't really believe so, because it's not mainly a matter of time.
51-4 by 0.375 (117.750 as high-end-guess).
24-1 tied.

Well done on getting your 0ths, van

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.06 (04:18)

xaelar wrote:I don't really believe so, because it's not mainly a matter of time.
51-4 by 0.375 (117.750 as high-end-guess).
24-1 tied.

Well done on getting your 0ths, van

You mean taking other people's innovs :P

And nice job taking my -> van's 0th. It's about time you started to get some more 0ths.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.06 (14:00)

xaelar wrote:51-4 by 0.375 (117.750 as high-end-guess).
24-1 tied.
Well done on getting your 0ths, van

taken back
nice
thx
EDIT: 60-2 by 1 frame

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.06 (15:05)

vankusss wrote: EDIT: 60-2 by 1 frame

Same :P but with a sloppy run.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.06 (15:25)

Izzy wrote:
vankusss wrote: EDIT: 60-2 by 1 frame
Same :P but with a sloppy run.

same :D

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.06 (20:23)

Same. (After you improved)

:P

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.06 (20:55)

Izzy wrote:Same. (After you improved)

:P

1 fraaaame (back)

http://nmaps.net/user/xaelar · Postby **xaelar** » 2009.12.06 (22:40)

vankusss wrote:
xaelar wrote:51-4 by 0.375 (117.750 as high-end-guess).
taken back

retaken by 6 frames.
If you get it again, you can have it.

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.08 (00:53)

15-3 taken from lat by 29 frames with a small innov.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.08 (19:59)

83-4 from L3X by 12 frames :)

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.08 (20:09)

I see what you did there. ¬¬

http://nmaps.net/user/golfkid · Postby **golf** » 2009.12.08 (20:19)

60-2 by 6 frames

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.08 (22:26)

golfkid wrote:60-2 by 6 frames

Holy nice. That makes 1 more of my innovations raped.

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.11 (15:23)

18-4 with modified route from kryX by 19 (!) frames
i think this is my first hs innov ever
edit: 40 frames

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2009.12.11 (15:59)

vankusss wrote:18-4 with modified route from kryX by 19 (!) frames
i think this is my first hs innov ever
edit: 40 frames

Nice run DekryXed by over a second, well done. Also what about 29-3, I didn't come up with that whole thing. Most of the innovation was yours.

http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy · Postby **Izzy** » 2009.12.13 (15:24)

http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss · Postby **vankusss** » 2009.12.13 (15:30)

Izzy wrote:10-2

Insane O.o

EDIT: 51-0 with route change from macrohenry :P

Metanet Forums

Metanet 0ths Thread

How many votes will this poll get?

Who is online