Premarital Sex

Debate serious and interesting topics, rant about politics or pop culture, or otherwise converse in essay form about your opinions. The rules of conduct here are a little stricter.
User avatar
Depressing
Posts: 1977
Joined: 2008.09.26 (06:46)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/rennaT
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Trenton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Postby Tanner » 2009.11.17 (23:28)

I generally agree with everything you've said in this thread, Suki, but I just want to clarify something with you. You aren't proposing that the combination of your formative years and a self-imposed abstinence will, of themselves, yield any noticable neuroses, are you? Because I think that's ridiculous. I would not be hard-pressed at all to find two people, one of whom has had sex eight times this week and one of whom is a virgin, and you wouldn't be able to tell me with any sort of certainty which is which because they are both equally happy, well-adjusted people. I'm not arguing in any way for abstinence or even that a number of restrictions on our natural urges will have a negative effect but you're making it sound like not having sex before you're 27 will inevitably turn you into a rapist and I think it would be beneficial to your argument if you were to clarify that this isn't what you think.

... if that's not what you think, of course.
Image
'rret donc d'niaser 'vec mon sirop d'erable, calis, si j't'r'vois icitte j'pellerais la police, tu l'veras l'criss de poutine de cul t'auras en prison, tabarnak

User avatar
Retrofuturist
Posts: 3131
Joined: 2008.09.19 (06:55)
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Postby t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư » 2009.11.18 (00:10)

rennaT wrote:I generally agree with everything you've said in this thread, Suki, but I just want to clarify something with you. You aren't proposing that the combination of your formative years and a self-imposed abstinence will, of themselves, yield any noticable neuroses, are you? Because I think that's ridiculous. I would not be hard-pressed at all to find two people, one of whom has had sex eight times this week and one of whom is a virgin, and you wouldn't be able to tell me with any sort of certainty which is which because they are both equally happy, well-adjusted people. I'm not arguing in any way for abstinence or even that a number of restrictions on our natural urges will have a negative effect but you're making it sound like not having sex before you're 27 will inevitably turn you into a rapist and I think it would be beneficial to your argument if you were to clarify that this isn't what you think.

... if that's not what you think, of course.
Haha, no, of course not. I suppose I could have done better to stress that I'm talking about total repression of your libido, where that circumstance implies that there's some overbearing guilt about the whole issue of sex. If imagery helps, picture someone curled up in the fetal position in the corner of his room and crying because he doesn't understand why Satan keeps giving him boners. Maybe he writes synonyms of "dirty" and "disgusting" all over his body with sharpie, or whips himself, or something; I wouldn't know because I've never been there. But that's the brand of repression I'm talking about, because I (possibly mistakenly) associate the "no premarital sex" crowd with the anti-masturbation league. I wouldn't trust a virgin who has never scaled his flagpole any further than I can throw him, but as for anyone else who knows how to take care of himself, I don't see that they'd be have any sort of unhealthy mental or emotional issues whatsoever.
[spoiler="you know i always joked that it would be scary as hell to run into DMX in a dark ally, but secretly when i say 'DMX' i really mean 'Tsukatu'." -kai]"... and when i say 'scary as hell' i really mean 'tight pink shirt'." -kai[/spoiler][/i]
spoiler

Image


User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.11.18 (00:44)

Tsukatu wrote: the fetal position in the corner of his room and crying because he doesn't understand why Satan keeps giving him boners. Maybe he writes synonyms of "dirty" and "disgusting" all over his body with sharpie, or whips himself,

What if we do those things -while- we are having sex?
Loathes

The number of Electoral College votes needed to be President of the US.
Posts: 278
Joined: 2009.09.16 (16:53)

Postby Aldaric » 2009.11.18 (02:16)

SlappyMcGee wrote:
Tsukatu wrote: the fetal position in the corner of his room and crying because he doesn't understand why Satan keeps giving him boners. Maybe he writes synonyms of "dirty" and "disgusting" all over his body with sharpie, or whips himself,

What if we do those things -while- we are having sex?
I have very vivid images in my mind. Good images.

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2009.11.20 (16:03)

Tsukatu wrote:If imagery helps, picture someone curled up in the fetal position in the corner of his room and crying because he doesn't understand why Satan keeps giving him boners. Maybe he writes synonyms of "dirty" and "disgusting" all over his body with sharpie, or whips himself, or something; I wouldn't know because I've never been there.
Surely that accounts for too small of a minority to account for any number of rapists at large today.

Edit: used "account" as a verb twice in the same sentence. I am shamed and must now fade from the public eye.
Image

User avatar
Albany, New York
Posts: 521
Joined: 2008.09.28 (02:00)
MBTI Type: INTJ
Location: Inner SE Portland, OR
Contact:

Postby jean-luc » 2009.11.26 (21:52)

Wight wrote:
Tsukatu wrote:If imagery helps, picture someone curled up in the fetal position in the corner of his room and crying because he doesn't understand why Satan keeps giving him boners. Maybe he writes synonyms of "dirty" and "disgusting" all over his body with sharpie, or whips himself, or something; I wouldn't know because I've never been there.
Surely that accounts for too small of a minority to account for any number of rapists at large today.

Edit: used "account" as a verb twice in the same sentence. I am shamed and must now fade from the public eye.
I don't see that it has to be that severe to have an effect in some people. It can generally be agreed that many rapists probably have a mental predisposition (as a matter of personality or perhaps mental illness). The same sort of position on sex, or I should say opposition to sex, may cause absolutely no trouble in one (perhaps 'normal') person. In another person, though, the libido may be more severe or they may have a predisposition to obsessive violence, and we get rapists. So, is the opposition to sex the problem? I take the position that people and their motivations are too complex to blame issues like rape on one single social artifact.
-- I might be stupid, but that's a risk we're going to have to take. --
Image
Website! Photography! Robots! Facebook!
The latest computers from Japan can also perform magical operations.

User avatar
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 1416
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/scythe33
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Postby scythe » 2009.12.01 (09:02)

Tsukatu wrote: Haha, no, of course not. I suppose I could have done better to stress that I'm talking about total repression of your libido, where that circumstance implies that there's some overbearing guilt about the whole issue of sex. If imagery helps, picture someone curled up in the fetal position in the corner of his room and crying because he doesn't understand why Satan keeps giving him boners. Maybe he writes synonyms of "dirty" and "disgusting" all over his body with sharpie, or whips himself, or something; I wouldn't know because I've never been there. But that's the brand of repression I'm talking about, because I (possibly mistakenly) associate the "no premarital sex" crowd with the anti-masturbation league. I wouldn't trust a virgin who has never scaled his flagpole any further than I can throw him, but as for anyone else who knows how to take care of himself, I don't see that they'd be have any sort of unhealthy mental or emotional issues whatsoever.
Exhibit A?
As soon as we wish to be happier, we are no longer happy.

User avatar
Bacardi
Posts: 160
Joined: 2009.03.30 (17:48)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/jinxed_07
Location: Inside that seeking drone

Postby jinxed_07 » 2009.12.07 (14:32)

Don't risk getting pregnant before you get married, all I have to say atm.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1318
Joined: 2008.12.04 (01:16)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924
Location: Tampa
Contact:

Postby Rose » 2009.12.11 (20:31)

Despite the fact that I'm a Christian, I don't think it's wrong to have sexual relations before marriage (oh my god a laid-back religious guy what're the odds). People are free to do whatever they want within the boundaries of the law. I am choosing, however, to wait until marriage (or at least engagement) to have sex, mainly because of the whole STD thing and pregnancy and all that shit. And I do believe that saving it can make the occasion special, but again, it's each individual's choice. As for the whole neurosis thing? It's called masturbation.

Sorry if all of that was covered already; a lot of posts in this thread were tl;dr so I only read the first ten or so.
Image

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.12.11 (21:32)

maxson924 wrote:Despite the fact that I'm a Christian, I don't think it's wrong to have sexual relations before marriage (oh my god a laid-back religious guy what're the odds). People are free to do whatever they want within the boundaries of the law. I am choosing, however, to wait until marriage (or at least engagement) to have sex, mainly because of the whole STD thing and pregnancy and all that shit. And I do believe that saving it can make the occasion special, but again, it's each individual's choice. As for the whole neurosis thing? It's called masturbation.

Sorry if all of that was covered already; a lot of posts in this thread were tl;dr so I only read the first ten or so.
A laid back Christian is somebody who has consciously decided to believe in Hell and go to it. Enjoy an eternity in horrible pain!
Loathes

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2009.12.11 (22:13)

SlappyMcGee wrote:A laid back Christian is somebody who has consciously decided to believe in Hell and go to it. Enjoy an eternity in horrible pain!
Seriously though, what?
Image

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.12.11 (23:12)

Wight wrote:
SlappyMcGee wrote:A laid back Christian is somebody who has consciously decided to believe in Hell and go to it. Enjoy an eternity in horrible pain!
Seriously though, what?
Seriously, if somebody says they are a Christian but "laid back", they are saying that they believe in Hell (as per being Christians) but that they have decided not to follow rules (defined by the Bible) and have instead decided to go to Hell. They fully believe in and embrace the idea of going to Hell.

I mean, if I thought Hell existed, I would not have premarital sex, or sell cocaine to minors. Luckily, I'm rational.
Loathes

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1318
Joined: 2008.12.04 (01:16)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924
Location: Tampa
Contact:

Postby Rose » 2009.12.12 (00:12)

SlappyMcGee wrote:
Wight wrote:
SlappyMcGee wrote:A laid back Christian is somebody who has consciously decided to believe in Hell and go to it. Enjoy an eternity in horrible pain!
Seriously though, what?
Seriously, if somebody says they are a Christian but "laid back", they are saying that they believe in Hell (as per being Christians) but that they have decided not to follow rules (defined by the Bible) and have instead decided to go to Hell. They fully believe in and embrace the idea of going to Hell.

I mean, if I thought Hell existed, I would not have premarital sex, or sell cocaine to minors. Luckily, I'm rational.
No no no. You misunderstand. I'm laid back when it comes to others' choices. I follow the Bible, but I'm not going to lose my shit on people who don't.
Image

Yet Another Harshad
Posts: 485
Joined: 2008.09.26 (19:27)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/skyline356
MBTI Type: INTP
Location: Connecticut

Postby Skyling » 2009.12.12 (03:36)

Premarital sex makes me hot!
Image

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco
MBTI Type: INTJ

Postby smartalco » 2009.12.12 (04:23)

SlappyMcGee wrote: Seriously, if somebody says they are a Christian but "laid back", they are saying that they believe in Hell (as per being Christians) but that they have decided not to follow rules (defined by the Bible) and have instead decided to go to Hell. They fully believe in and embrace the idea of going to Hell.
I'm catholic, and described by my friends as one of the most laid back people you'll ever meet. I'm still wondering why this makes me go to hell. (Because I don't actively (or even passively) try to convert other people to christianity?)
Image
Tycho: "I don't know why people ever, ever try to stop nerds from doing things. It's really the most incredible waste of time."
Adam Savage: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

Boeing Boeing Bone!
Posts: 769
Joined: 2008.09.27 (05:31)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/yungerkid
MBTI Type: INTJ
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Postby yungerkid » 2009.12.12 (04:27)

Have you ever experienced true sex? True sex?

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.12.12 (06:14)

smartalco wrote:
SlappyMcGee wrote: Seriously, if somebody says they are a Christian but "laid back", they are saying that they believe in Hell (as per being Christians) but that they have decided not to follow rules (defined by the Bible) and have instead decided to go to Hell. They fully believe in and embrace the idea of going to Hell.
I'm catholic, and described by my friends as one of the most laid back people you'll ever meet. I'm still wondering why this makes me go to hell. (Because I don't actively (or even passively) try to convert other people to christianity?)
Maybe you should re-read the topic and understand the connotation of laid back and why I used it in quotes. The way he referred to laid back was in such a way as to describe the way he actively follows the tenets of his religion. I didn't say that laid back people are going to Hell.
Loathes

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1318
Joined: 2008.12.04 (01:16)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/maxson924
Location: Tampa
Contact:

Postby Rose » 2009.12.12 (21:01)

SlappyMcGee wrote:
smartalco wrote:
SlappyMcGee wrote: Seriously, if somebody says they are a Christian but "laid back", they are saying that they believe in Hell (as per being Christians) but that they have decided not to follow rules (defined by the Bible) and have instead decided to go to Hell. They fully believe in and embrace the idea of going to Hell.
I'm catholic, and described by my friends as one of the most laid back people you'll ever meet. I'm still wondering why this makes me go to hell. (Because I don't actively (or even passively) try to convert other people to christianity?)
Maybe you should re-read the topic and understand the connotation of laid back and why I used it in quotes. The way he referred to laid back was in such a way as to describe the way he actively follows the tenets of his religion. I didn't say that laid back people are going to Hell.
maxson924 wrote:No no no. You misunderstand. I'm laid back when it comes to others' choices. I follow the Bible, but I'm not going to lose my shit on people who don't.
Image

"Asked ortsz for a name change"
Posts: 3380
Joined: 2008.11.13 (16:47)

Postby otters~1 » 2009.12.13 (02:29)

Really confused. Is there a pun involving the word 'laid' that I'm missing here?
the dusk the dawn the earth the sea

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.12.13 (03:36)

flagmyidol wrote:Really confused. Is there a pun involving the word 'laid' that I'm missing here?
maxson said he was laid back so he did not preach to others about fucking hoes before Marriage.
I pointed out that a laid-back Christian (as in, somebody who does not follow the Bible strictly) is somebody who embraces Hell.
Misunderstanding.
smartalco was trying to figure out why being a cool guy made you go to hell.
Loathes

User avatar
Retrofuturist
Posts: 3131
Joined: 2008.09.19 (06:55)
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Postby t̷s͢uk̕a͡t͜ư » 2009.12.13 (08:54)

SlappyMcGee wrote:smartalco was trying to figure out why being a cool guy made you go to hell.
Oh, well I can answer that for you.
"that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." -Luke 16:15
I'm godless, and I hold being a cool guy in high esteem. Therefore it's an abomination to God.
[spoiler="you know i always joked that it would be scary as hell to run into DMX in a dark ally, but secretly when i say 'DMX' i really mean 'Tsukatu'." -kai]"... and when i say 'scary as hell' i really mean 'tight pink shirt'." -kai[/spoiler][/i]
spoiler

Image


User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco
MBTI Type: INTJ

Postby smartalco » 2009.12.13 (19:45)

Tsukatu wrote:I'm godless, and I hold being a cool guy in high esteem. Therefore it's an abomination to God.
But you are a god. Which raises the question, can God create a god that he can not lift?
Image
Tycho: "I don't know why people ever, ever try to stop nerds from doing things. It's really the most incredible waste of time."
Adam Savage: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

User avatar
Queen of All Spiders
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2008.09.29 (03:54)
NUMA Profile: http://www.freeWoWgold.edu
MBTI Type: ENFP
Location: Quebec, Canada!

Postby SlappyMcGee » 2009.12.13 (20:01)

smartalco wrote:
Tsukatu wrote:I'm godless, and I hold being a cool guy in high esteem. Therefore it's an abomination to God.
But you are a god. Which raises the question, can God create a god that he can not lift?
And more importantly, at what point did Jesus' fetus become a human being?
Loathes

"Asked ortsz for a name change"
Posts: 3380
Joined: 2008.11.13 (16:47)

Postby otters~1 » 2009.12.13 (20:36)

SlappyMcGee wrote: I pointed out that a laid-back Christian (as in, somebody who does not follow the Bible strictly) is somebody who embraces Hell.
This was the bit I did not follow.
the dusk the dawn the earth the sea

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:35)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/smartalco
MBTI Type: INTJ

Postby smartalco » 2009.12.13 (21:04)

SlappyMcGee wrote:
smartalco wrote:
Tsukatu wrote:I'm godless, and I hold being a cool guy in high esteem. Therefore it's an abomination to God.
But you are a god. Which raises the question, can God create a god that he can not lift?
And more importantly, at what point did Jesus' fetus become a human being?
After the first wise-man's there. (stretching the limits of rhyming a bit)
Image
Tycho: "I don't know why people ever, ever try to stop nerds from doing things. It's really the most incredible waste of time."
Adam Savage: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest