Important Highscore Announcement!

Are you a rad N player or want to put some rad N players to the test? Talk about your skills and challenge each other at N in this forum.

Moderators: EddyMataGallos, TheRealOne

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1402
Joined: 2008.10.01 (01:36)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/therealone

Postby TheRealOne » 2010.01.03 (05:18)

Unreality and I have been working on changing the way you view the Metanet highscore boards. I am sure you all have grown tired of having to ignore all of hackers and cheaters. And I suspect that the only reason that we don’t all turn on legit mode is because there are still so many great runs on the Metanet boards. Well the solution we have come up with is to port these runs over to the Nreality server and then change the way you see the Metanet boards.

I currently have a list of all of the 0ths that are not on Nreality. (Ignoring hackers of course) I have gathered the demo data for each run along with the score and player; Unreality has also given me a way in which to upload these scores to the Nreality server. I plan to upload these 0ths to the Nreality server however getting the demo data for each run and then uploading it is a very time consuming and tedious process. This means that I will not be able to do all of the non-Nreality top-20s, unless a few people are willing to help me.

So, what I have proposed to Unreality is that we make the 00-99 episodes just like the 100+ are on non-legit mode. So the idea is that when you are looking at 00-99 in Nreality (and this could be in either a new mode, like legit mode 1 and 2, or just the only option) the boards would be exactly like the Metanet boards (if we could get all of the top-20s) except without the hackers and cheaters. Also there would be a . if the run was uploaded rather than done on Nreality. And if you turned legit mode on these runs would not be there.

However if we were not able to get all of the top-20s, and only these 0ths get imported would you guys (the community) be willing to sacrifice all of the non-Nreality top-20s to not have to look at the boards with hackers and cheaters anymore?

The next question I have to ask the community is that which player’s runs do you think should get uploaded. Keep in mind that these runs will not be considered legit runs, however they will be in the 0th spot whenever viewing the boards not in legit mode. All of these runs will have a . next to the player’s name.
The last question I have is, for the runs that you guys do not want on the new boards, ie. kryX-orange I think we can all agree that his highscores should not be on the boards. However some of his runs contain innovations and they are just cool to watch. I am wondering if you guys would mind if I placed these runs on the underclock boards? I would also being willing to do this for mohamedraif’s manually built demos, if he and you guys are ok with that?

Here are all of the 0ths that are not on the Nreality servers I have them in two lists: commonly accepted cheaters, and everyone else. Please cast your vote if you disagree with adding a particular player so it can at least be discussed.

Code: Select all

06-4	Ben_Schultz_11
11-2	Ben_Schultz_11
11-3	Ben_Schultz_11
17-4	Ben_Schultz_11
28-4	Ben_Schultz_11
34-3	Ben_Schultz_11
43-4	Ben_Schultz_11
71-1	Ben_Schultz_11
74-1	Ben_Schultz_11
82-0	cheese_god
90-3  cheese_god
35     Chouse
16-1	Gforce20
31-3	Hendor
97-0	Hendor
21-3	johnny_faneca
29-2	johnny_faneca
52-0	johnny_faneca
61-0	johnny_faneca
63-4	johnny_faneca
74-4	johnny_faneca
84-1	johnny_faneca
99-0	johnny_faneca
67-2	Just4TheFun
78-3	macrohenry
83-0	macrohenry
84-2	macrohenry
85-4	macrohenry
92-3	macrohenry
09-3	mc_george
14-0	mc_george
77-0	Pheidippides
27-0	schwah
49-0	Seifer
66-1	Seifer
80-2	Seifer
05-3	Sp33dy
36-3	Sp33dy
62-4	Sp33dy
72-2	Sp33dy
80-3	spect
89-0	spect
19-3	TearsOfTheSaints
08-1	The_TGM_Project
10-0	The_TGM_Project
10-3	The_TGM_Project
51-2	The_TGM_Project
53-0	The_TGM_Project
41-0	thedupli
45-4	trib4lmaniac
55-0	trib4lmaniac
56-2	trib4lmaniac
88-1	trib4lmaniac
91-4	TWA_MATO_Titan
42-2	Wolfos
91-0	zorgtz
85-2	zxcvzxcv

Code: Select all

00-1	ANGERFIST
02-1	L3X
02-2	Goo
02-4	Goo
03-3	crappitrash
03-4	kryX-orange
04-4	crappitrash
05-0	crappitrash
05-3	kryX-orange
06-1	Bonzai
09-3	kryX-orange
11-1	L3X
12-4	kryX-orange
13-1 	crappitrash
13-4	kryX-orange
15-2	Bonzai
20-0	ANGERFIST
20-1	kryX-orange
20-3 	kryX-orange
21-0	L3X
22-1 	crappitrash
25-3	Bonzai
26-1	naem
26-4	L3X
27-4	ANGERFIST
28-0	ANGERFIST
29-0	kryX-orange
29-1 	crappitrash
29-4	kryX-orange
30-0	ANGERFIST
32-1	kryX-orange
33-0	L3X
33-1	L3X
34-2	L3X
38-4 	crappitrash
40-3	L3X
45-4 	crappitrash
46-3	L3X
47-4	L3X
50-1 	crappitrash
50-3	kryX-orange
53-0	kryX-orange
55-3 	crappitrash
60-3 	crappitrash
61-3	kryX-orange
62-4 	crappitrash
64-2	crappitrash
64-3	L3X
65-0	kryX-orange
65-3	L3X
67-1	kryX-orange
70-1	kryX-orange
70-1	L3X
71-3	kryX-orange
73-3	L3X
79-4	naem
80-0	kryX-orange
80-1	kryX-orange
80-2	naem
81-0	crappitrash
81-3	crappitrash
82-0	ANGERFIST
83-1	crappitrash
Last edited by TheRealOne on 2010.01.03 (20:19), edited 1 time in total.
<@Izzy> Holy balls, sweet run.
<@gloomp> Holy sweet, balls run.
<@Izzy> Sweet, balls run holy.
<@gloomp> Run sweet, balls holy.
<@Izzy> Sweet run, ballsy hole.
<@gloomp> All's sweet, holeb run.
<@Izzy> Ballsy nun, sweet mole.
Image

<@Kool> bro no joke, I saw the sexiest swedish chick giving herself anal on one of those pop-up alarm-clocks at my uncle's house

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1402
Joined: 2008.10.01 (01:36)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/therealone

Postby TheRealOne » 2010.01.03 (06:07)

Sorry for the double post, but this is me posting my opinions on the matter. I think that all of the players listed in the second list should not be put in to the highscore mode, but should be ported in to underclock.

I am pretty sure that cheese_god's and zxcvzxcv's runs are cheated. Also Sp33dY and Ben_schultz_11 have admitted to cheating before and some of their runs look cheated.

Everyone one else I am pretty sure is legit. That said I think that all of the 0ths except cheese_god's and zxcvzxcv's should be uploaded because they are going to be .0ths anyway.

Just to remind everyone I am not trying to restart and old flame war from the old days, just trying to get some honest discussion about it.
<@Izzy> Holy balls, sweet run.
<@gloomp> Holy sweet, balls run.
<@Izzy> Sweet, balls run holy.
<@gloomp> Run sweet, balls holy.
<@Izzy> Sweet run, ballsy hole.
<@gloomp> All's sweet, holeb run.
<@Izzy> Ballsy nun, sweet mole.
Image

<@Kool> bro no joke, I saw the sexiest swedish chick giving herself anal on one of those pop-up alarm-clocks at my uncle's house

User avatar
Damn You're Fine
Posts: 389
Joined: 2008.10.13 (10:10)

Postby Unreality » 2010.01.03 (06:33)

I will vote to put The_TGM_Project 's runs into underscore mode instead

I have pm TGM whether he cheats or not, but he replied something else and dodging my question.

Jedi Pimp
Posts: 681
Joined: 2008.11.10 (17:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/

Postby Raif » 2010.01.03 (07:16)

I think some runs by Ben_Schultz_11 and Sp33dy are cheated. Probably all of cheese_god's 0ths are cheated and possibly all of TGM's as well. I am not sure about schwah or zxcvzxcv though.
TheRealOne wrote: The last question I have is, for the runs that you guys do not want on the new boards, ie. kryX-orange I think we can all agree that his highscores should not be on the boards. However some of his runs contain innovations and they are just cool to watch. I am wondering if you guys would mind if I placed these runs on the underclock boards? I would also being willing to do this for mohamedraif’s manually built demos, if he and you guys are ok with that?
You can do that but I think all of those runs should be dotted.
Edit: And by the way the title of the topic says "Importanat".
Edit2: I think you should upload tied 0ths too. (if you already haven't planned too)

User avatar
Subterranean Engineer
Posts: 1694
Joined: 2008.09.26 (16:15)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy
MBTI Type: INTP

Postby Izzy » 2010.01.03 (16:19)

jf is legit imo, but lord_day once said that he admitted to cheating (he was testing out cheatengine I think) on a few levels. I agree with moh, except for TGM, I haven't seen anything that gives him away as a cheater. Gforce, Hendor, and Pheidi go in. I still think that they might have their runs in their .sols, but I'll ask on IRC.
Image
Derived from ksktorngsig!
I don't think the universe has infinite material though, unless God makes DLC packs. - SkyPanda

User avatar
Phei Phei Pho Phum
Posts: 1456
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:28)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Pheidippides
MBTI Type: ISFJ
Location: New Jersey

Postby Pheidippides » 2010.01.03 (18:07)

Izzy wrote:I still think that they might have their runs in their .sols, but I'll ask on IRC.
I've got my run. What do you want me to do with it?
Image
Follow me! @ninjarobotfeidi #nmaps

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1094
Joined: 2009.01.31 (22:13)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss
Contact:

Postby vankusss » 2010.01.03 (18:10)

i vote for cheated runs to be on underclock (mohs, too, they are awesome)
Sp33dy cheated on ep 22 (he admitted on old forums as moh told me), and since there is no way how to determine if he cheated on other levels (72-2 chimneys are really suspicious) i vote for him to be on underclock
ska's 34-3 is just weird, he has to say something to it
we have nothing against TGM
iNsane http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwrkTEaTXk4 (watch in 480p)( yellow wins )

User avatar
Subterranean Engineer
Posts: 1694
Joined: 2008.09.26 (16:15)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Izzy
MBTI Type: INTP

Postby Izzy » 2010.01.03 (18:18)

Pheidippides wrote:
Izzy wrote:I still think that they might have their runs in their .sols, but I'll ask on IRC.
I've got my run. What do you want me to do with it?
To submit it to Nreality's LegitMode board, if you have it.
Image
Derived from ksktorngsig!
I don't think the universe has infinite material though, unless God makes DLC packs. - SkyPanda

Jedi Pimp
Posts: 681
Joined: 2008.11.10 (17:37)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/

Postby Raif » 2010.01.03 (18:35)

Izzy wrote:
Pheidippides wrote:
Izzy wrote:I still think that they might have their runs in their .sols, but I'll ask on IRC.
I've got my run. What do you want me to do with it?
To submit it to Nreality's LegitMode board, if you have it.
I don't think that's possible. :/

User avatar
Boeing Boeing Bone!
Posts: 762
Joined: 2009.02.20 (12:23)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Seneschal
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: London, UK

Postby Seneschal » 2010.01.03 (18:48)

Izzy wrote:jf is legit imo, but lord_day once said that he admitted to cheating (he was testing out cheatengine I think) on a few levels
http://metanet.2.forumer.com/index.php? ... ntry206416

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1402
Joined: 2008.10.01 (01:36)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/therealone

Postby TheRealOne » 2010.01.03 (20:24)

Izzy wrote:
Pheidippides wrote:
Izzy wrote:I still think that they might have their runs in their .sols, but I'll ask on IRC.
I've got my run. What do you want me to do with it?
To submit it to Nreality's LegitMode board, if you have it.

This is possible if you just hit submit EP 77, your 77-0 0th will be put as a dot run for now until the highscore move is complete then it will be a dot0th.

OK, so I submitted the 0ths that were not controversial and I am left with these runs.

Code: Select all

06-4	Ben_Schultz_11
11-2	Ben_Schultz_11
11-3	Ben_Schultz_11
17-4	Ben_Schultz_11
28-4	Ben_Schultz_11
34-3	Ben_Schultz_11
43-4	Ben_Schultz_11
71-1	Ben_Schultz_11
74-1	Ben_Schultz_11

82-0	cheese_god

35	Chouse

77-0	Pheidippides

27-0	schwah

05-3	Sp33dy
36-3	Sp33dy
62-4	Sp33dy
72-2	Sp33dy

08-1	The_TGM_Project
10-0	The_TGM_Project
10-3	The_TGM_Project
51-2	The_TGM_Project
53-0	The_TGM_Project

85-2	zxcvzxcv
I plan to put Sp33dY on the underclock boards. cheese_god I am pretty sure cheated both 82-0 and 90-3, so I am ignoring him. I plan to submit schwah and Chouse, unless someone has something to say more about either. I am sure Chouse is legit, but schwah's 27-0 could be cheated, but we have no proof. I am just waiting for Pheidippides to submit his 77-0. I am ignoring zxcvzxcv's 85-2 because there is a hacker with a similar name and he only has two top 20s and that run is too good for someone with only two top 20s. This leaves TGM who I am inclined to submit just because we have no proof, but I am open to more discussion about him.
<@Izzy> Holy balls, sweet run.
<@gloomp> Holy sweet, balls run.
<@Izzy> Sweet, balls run holy.
<@gloomp> Run sweet, balls holy.
<@Izzy> Sweet run, ballsy hole.
<@gloomp> All's sweet, holeb run.
<@Izzy> Ballsy nun, sweet mole.
Image

<@Kool> bro no joke, I saw the sexiest swedish chick giving herself anal on one of those pop-up alarm-clocks at my uncle's house

User avatar
Yet Another Harshad
Posts: 449
Joined: 2008.10.29 (14:10)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/amomentlikethis
MBTI Type: ESFP
Location: England.
Contact:

Postby amomentlikethis » 2010.01.29 (00:10)

vankusss wrote:i vote for cheated runs to be on underclock (mohs, too, they are awesome)
There's a difference between playing in slow motion and using FBF, so this idea would be stupid.
Hi.

User avatar
Smoothest Taint in the West
Posts: 3241
Joined: 2008.09.29 (14:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/ska
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
Location: Australia

Postby ska » 2010.01.29 (12:23)

vankusss wrote:i vote for cheated runs to be on underclock (mohs, too, they are awesome)
Sp33dy cheated on ep 22 (he admitted on old forums as moh told me), and since there is no way how to determine if he cheated on other levels (72-2 chimneys are really suspicious) i vote for him to be on underclock
ska's 34-3 is just weird, he has to say something to it
we have nothing against TGM
OK - firstly guys - the only Metanet run I cheated isn't even a 0th anymore (29-3 for reference)

Since then I have submitted legit Metanet 0ths on NReality 12-0, 42-0 (still standing) and 6-4 (also still standing) and none on the Metanet servers alone since the arrival of NReality if that even counts for anything -.-

I don't know why 6-4 was even flagged as I assure you it is a legitimate run.
Oh I see, it wasn't resubmitted to NReality after the server crash. *resubmitted 6-4 for prosperity*

as for 34-3 - what can I say? Ultra well timed chimney jumping (admittedly it was quite lucky), and a slightly messy ending. Not sure why you suspect that run to be cheated to be honest.. especially after seeing some of the runs on 121027

I also agree quite strongly with Unreality about The TGM Project. I'm about 80% he cheated his runs.

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1094
Joined: 2009.01.31 (22:13)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss
Contact:

Postby vankusss » 2010.01.29 (14:17)

ska wrote:as for 34-3 - what can I say? Ultra well timed chimney jumping (admittedly it was quite lucky), and a slightly messy ending. Not sure why you suspect that run to be cheated to be honest.. especially after seeing some of the runs on 121027.
why do we suspect it? because of this:
demo analysis

249. J - 1 frame
250. Nothing - 1 frame
251. J - 1 frame
252. Nothing - 1 frame
253. LJ - 3 frames
256. RJ - 2 frames
258. J - 8 frames
266. RJ - 4 frames
270. R - 2 frames
272. RJ - 1 frame
273. Nothing - 1 frame
274. J - 1 frame
275. Nothing - 1 frame

121027 is another case; nobody is doing fbf perfect chimneys in the middle of the run twice in a row timed that well
i won't say anything else, these are pretty much all of my arguments, i don't want you to hate me or so, so if you say it's legit then it's over...
iNsane http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwrkTEaTXk4 (watch in 480p)( yellow wins )

User avatar
Smoothest Taint in the West
Posts: 3241
Joined: 2008.09.29 (14:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/ska
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
Location: Australia

Postby ska » 2010.01.30 (16:50)

vankusss wrote:
ska wrote:as for 34-3 - what can I say? Ultra well timed chimney jumping (admittedly it was quite lucky), and a slightly messy ending. Not sure why you suspect that run to be cheated to be honest.. especially after seeing some of the runs on 121027.
why do we suspect it? because of this:
demo analysis

249. J - 1 frame
250. Nothing - 1 frame
251. J - 1 frame
252. Nothing - 1 frame
253. LJ - 3 frames
256. RJ - 2 frames
258. J - 8 frames
266. RJ - 4 frames
270. R - 2 frames
272. RJ - 1 frame
273. Nothing - 1 frame
274. J - 1 frame
275. Nothing - 1 frame

121027 is another case; nobody is doing fbf perfect chimneys in the middle of the run twice in a row timed that well
i won't say anything else, these are pretty much all of my arguments, i don't want you to hate me or so, so if you say it's legit then it's over...
haha - that's cool - my point here is - up until yesterday - you guys put old runs (including 6-4 down; a dronie nominated run from last year btw) as questionable. Then i submitted it and it's all good - what more do I have to do to convince you guys? Unfortunately the 34-3 run was made before the existence of NReality. Obviously, the onus is on me to demonstrate my runs are legit and I have done that multiple times since the introduction of NReality. As for perfect chimneying - what's the big deal? Spect's done it, plenty of people have pulled it off - stop trying to pick holes and play the game.

User avatar
Lifer
Posts: 1094
Joined: 2009.01.31 (22:13)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/vankusss
Contact:

Postby vankusss » 2010.01.30 (16:57)

ska you clearly don't know what perfect chimneying is
just for record, spect's chimney on 89-0 looks like this:
demo analysis

278. J - 1 frame
279. Nothing - 2 frames
281. J - 1 frame
282. Nothing - 1 frame
283. J - 2 frames
285. Nothing - 2 frames
287. J - 1 frame
288. Nothing - 1 frame
289. J - 3 frames
292. Nothing - 1 frame
293. J - 1 frame
294. Nothing - 1 frame
295. J - 2 frames
297. Nothing - 1 frame
298. J - 1 frame
299. Nothing - 1 frame

what is far from perfect, i doubt he ever did it. only kool's run on 121027 has perfect chimneying (well, with one 2 in the demo analysis)
that's the big deal
iNsane http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwrkTEaTXk4 (watch in 480p)( yellow wins )

User avatar
Smoothest Taint in the West
Posts: 3241
Joined: 2008.09.29 (14:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/ska
Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
Location: Australia

Postby ska » 2010.01.30 (18:12)

vankusss wrote:ska you clearly don't know what perfect chimneying is
just for record, spect's chimney on 89-0 looks like this:
demo analysis

278. J - 1 frame
279. Nothing - 2 frames
281. J - 1 frame
282. Nothing - 1 frame
283. J - 2 frames
285. Nothing - 2 frames
287. J - 1 frame
288. Nothing - 1 frame
289. J - 3 frames
292. Nothing - 1 frame
293. J - 1 frame
294. Nothing - 1 frame
295. J - 2 frames
297. Nothing - 1 frame
298. J - 1 frame
299. Nothing - 1 frame

what is far from perfect, i doubt he ever did it. only kool's run on 121027 has perfect chimneying (well, with one 2 in the demo analysis)
that's the big deal
I am disappointed... to think I voted for you as "Player of the Year" too.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests