Andrew James Photography
- Life Time Achievement Award
- Posts: 248
- Joined: 2009.10.06 (19:25)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Mute_Monk
- MBTI Type: INTP
- Admin
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: 2008.09.27 (16:53)
- NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Aidiera :3
- Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
- MBTI Type: INTJ
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Pics or GTFO----wait, you do have pics...
And they're awesome. :)
And they're awesome. :)
//--^.^--\\
\\.:.^.:.//
- Oops Pow Surprise
- Posts: 635
- Joined: 2008.09.26 (22:09)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
- MBTI Type: INTJ
Pretty good, I guess. You don't have very much range, from what I can tell from these pictures. But the one you do have are quite good.
- Not So Awesome Blossom
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:28)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
- Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
- Location: USA
-
- Yet Another Harshad
- Posts: 485
- Joined: 2008.09.26 (19:27)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/skyline356
- MBTI Type: INTP
- Location: Connecticut
The pictures get progressively worse to me. I really enjoy the first and second, though.
-
- dreams slip through our fingers like hott slut sexxx
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: 2009.01.14 (15:41)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Tunco123
- MBTI Type: INTJ
- Location: Istanbul
I love the first and second one. The other two seems so blurry and dark when compared to the first two.
- Antonio Banderas
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 2008.09.26 (13:56)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/donfuy
- MBTI Type: ISTP
- Location: port
The second one is very, very cool.
- Not So Awesome Blossom
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 2008.09.26 (21:28)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
- Steam: www.steamcommunity.com/id/
- Location: USA
- Demon Fisherman
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: 2008.10.01 (23:37)
- NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/squibbles
- MBTI Type: ENFP
- Location: Canberra
The first would be much better if the horizon was more...horizontal. It's unbalanced, and feels like the water is going to fall off the side of the frame.
The second is fantastic.
The third would be much better if there was a little more sky and a little less mountain. Since you had to underexpose the mountain to get the clouds in focus, it appears as a giant smudge on the lens. A giant smudge which is taking up 1/4 of the frame.
The fourth one looks a little weird, because of the cloud dividing it perfectly through the middle. Cropping doesn't really fix it (I did it with my hand), so I guess...I dunno. It'd've looked better if you went higher, and looked down so that the water was at the very bottom.
The second is fantastic.
The third would be much better if there was a little more sky and a little less mountain. Since you had to underexpose the mountain to get the clouds in focus, it appears as a giant smudge on the lens. A giant smudge which is taking up 1/4 of the frame.
The fourth one looks a little weird, because of the cloud dividing it perfectly through the middle. Cropping doesn't really fix it (I did it with my hand), so I guess...I dunno. It'd've looked better if you went higher, and looked down so that the water was at the very bottom.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests