Metanet/NReality Speedrun 0th's

http://nmaps.net/user/macrohenry · Postby **macrohenry** » 2014.09.09 (21:36)

MiBeM wrote:Took 69-4 by cleaning. That level is really fun to run, so flowy :D

Taken, but it's still improvable, especially the ending. ;)

http://nmaps.net/user/EddyMataGallos · Postby **EddyMataGallos** » 2014.09.09 (23:57)

macrohenry wrote:
MiBeM wrote:Took 69-4 by cleaning. That level is really fun to run, so flowy :D
Taken, but it's still improvable, especially the ending. ;)

Taken, my start was slow though. Also took 24-1 and 24-2. Tied 23-1 and 67-3.

http://nmaps.net/user/EddyMataGallos · Postby **EddyMataGallos** » 2014.09.27 (02:50)

Felt like doing some sr today after practising safe routes for a column speedrun. Took 8-0, 9-3, 12-1, 13-3, 14-0, 14-3, 14-4. Tied 00-4 and 9-0.

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2014.09.28 (00:43)

EddyMataGallos wrote:Felt like doing some sr today after practising safe routes for a column speedrun. Took 8-0, 9-3, 12-1, 13-3, 14-0, 14-3, 14-4. Tied 00-4 and 9-0.

Awesome stuff. Those were some very clean 0ths you took. Impressive.

http://nmaps.net/user/macrohenry · Postby **macrohenry** » 2014.10.01 (17:34)

Great runs! I really like the low jumps on 09-0 and 12-1.

Took 09-3. :)

http://nmaps.net/user/MiBeM · Postby **MiBeM** » 2014.10.06 (17:48)

After weeks of sporadically coming back for a few attempts at 69-2 I finally got a decent run. It's still improvable by a hell of a lot towards the end but that level is just a nightmare with all the cornerjumps so I think I'll leave it behind for now.

http://nmaps.net/user/EddyMataGallos · Postby **EddyMataGallos** » 2014.10.06 (19:19)

Nice run, it is indeed very improvable but I agree its a pain. Moreover, venturing for a new route implies having to deal with drones in unexpected places. I can see a sub-1100 run here, maybe even sub-1000? Just by avoiding any mistakes. Getting an ending like this would help:

$69-2###11111111500000021115021111111150000000021100011111115003115000311000211111500002100031110000111114000031000021100031111115003114000311003111111500311500031110002111150000210000021100001111400003100000311000311111500311400031110031111150031150000021100021115000021000000311000011140000310000031110003111150031140000021100311115003115000000311000211500002100000031110000114000031000000021100031115003114000000311003111500311500000031110002150000210000000021100001400003100000000311000311500311400000031110031150031150000000021100025000021000000000311000040000310000000031110003150031140000000021100315003115000000000311000200011100000000031150000000111000000000025000030001114000000000000003140311114000000000000311|5^96,372!12^600,156!12^504,180!12^408,204!12^312,228!12^216,252!12^120,276!12^120,156!12^216,132!12^312,108!12^408,84!12^504,60!12^600,36!12^72,420!11^708,84,48,300#292:0|17825809|17895697|22369745|17895697|89478609|89478485|107880533|107374182|40265318|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35840546|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|48374306|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|237117986|35791398|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|107376162|40265318|35791394|35791394|139810

Which surprisingly isn't that hard if you approach the final section with enough speed.
Its also probably the least clean level in highscore mode.

Anyway, took 22-4, 23-2, 25-0, 25-1, 25-4, 26-0 and 43-4, to keep the ball rolling.

http://nmaps.net/user/MiBeM · Postby **MiBeM** » 2014.10.12 (18:40)

Randomly took 71-2 while trying to just learn the route :P Still improvable, Kool is a few frames ahead of me for the entire first half.

http://www.nmaps.net/user/Aidiera · Postby **aids** » 2014.10.12 (23:42)

MiBeM wrote:Randomly took 71-2 while trying to just learn the route :P Still improvable, Kool is a few frames ahead of me for the entire first half.

Just popping in to say that your 44-2 innov is wonderful. Good jorb.

http://nmaps.net/user/MiBeM · Postby **MiBeM** » 2014.10.13 (08:45)

▲▪►▪▼◄▲ wrote:Just popping in to say that your 44-2 innov is wonderful. Good jorb.

Thanks! It's definitely one of my best runs.

http://nmaps.net/user/macrohenry · Postby **macrohenry** » 2014.10.17 (15:40)

Took 77-4. I got 192f on my first try and 189f on my second one. :O No idea how I did that.

Postby **Hendor** » 2014.10.17 (19:45)

Still not as fast as your hs 0th :P

http://nmaps.net/user/EddyMataGallos · Postby **EddyMataGallos** » 2014.10.18 (20:12)

All runs that have beaten clux's original 0th are yours :P

http://nmaps.net/user/golfkid · Postby **golf** » 2014.10.19 (17:37)

Took 89-4. Surprised nobody has used the new route yet here, so it wasn't too hard to take. Kind of a terrible-ish run I put up to be honest, plenty of room for improvement.

http://nmaps.net/user/macrohenry · Postby **macrohenry** » 2014.10.19 (20:30)

golf wrote:Took 89-4. Surprised nobody has used the new route yet here, so it wasn't too hard to take. Kind of a terrible-ish run I put up to be honest, plenty of room for improvement.

Taken. ;) I wonder who gets a sub-1000 run first.

http://nmaps.net/user/golfkid · Postby **golf** » 2014.10.19 (20:49)

macrohenry wrote:
golf wrote:Took 89-4. Surprised nobody has used the new route yet here, so it wasn't too hard to take. Kind of a terrible-ish run I put up to be honest, plenty of room for improvement.
Taken. ;) I wonder who gets a sub-1000 run first.

Nice one macro :) Bet its going to be whoever skips that last stop on the tile before exiting the mountain. That would definitely save a good bit of time.

http://nmaps.net/user/macrohenry · Postby **macrohenry** » 2014.10.19 (21:21)

golf wrote:
macrohenry wrote:
golf wrote:Took 89-4. Surprised nobody has used the new route yet here, so it wasn't too hard to take. Kind of a terrible-ish run I put up to be honest, plenty of room for improvement.
Taken. ;) I wonder who gets a sub-1000 run first.
Nice one macro :) Bet its going to be whoever skips that last stop on the tile before exiting the mountain. That would definitely save a good bit of time.

Yeah, I did that several times, but died later. That's your chance! :D

Just took 47-2.

http://nmaps.net/user/therealone · Postby **TheRealOne** » 2014.10.20 (01:19)

macrohenry wrote: Just took 47-2.

Nice use of the bounce block and the absolute minimal use of the right key when jumping over the floorguard. I didn't think anyone would top Kool after he got that awesome thwump push. But he held back to much when jumping the FG.

http://nmaps.net/user/MiBeM · Postby **MiBeM** » 2014.11.25 (19:53)

Took 74-1 with a little innov, the ending is sloppy compared to Eddy's so there's still about five frames to be gained. Also took the episode with some unusually good runs.

http://nmaps.net/user/EddyMataGallos · Postby **EddyMataGallos** » 2014.11.25 (20:43)

Nice one man, avoiding the wait. Retaken. You were probably right about the time, I doubt there are more than 2-3 frames now.

Also, I can't understand how 74-0 0th is so unpolished at the beginning, compare with the hs 0th to see the optimal start. Someone has to apply that to sr, there are many frames left. I'll do it if I have time.

EDIT: Taken, still cleanable though. Also grabbed -2.

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2014.11.27 (11:06)

EddyMataGallos wrote:took 22-4, 23-2, 25-0, 25-1, 25-4, 26-0 and 43-4, to keep the ball rolling.

I know I'm a bit late to the party, here. (I couldn't really use NReality on my new laptop, and since it is currently being repaired, I have reverted back to my old one where I can, hence some more highscores on NReality, but I digress.)

I suppose demo mode, if nothing else, has given us the ability to see the minute differences between two runs as a spectator, and allow us to fully appreciate each 0th run. This was particularly so in your 25-1 run, where I thought kool's run was already quite brilliant. Then I saw your added corner jump — subtle though it was — and I was extremely impressed.

BTW, took 43-3 sr by over half a second using an innov.

http://nmaps.net/user/macrohenry · Postby **macrohenry** » 2014.11.27 (12:20)

ska wrote:BTW, took 43-3 sr by over half a second using an innov.

What a clever innovation, ska. Well done!

http://nmaps.net/user/ska · Postby **ska** » 2014.11.27 (18:28)

macrohenry wrote:
ska wrote:BTW, took 43-3 sr by over half a second using an innov.
What a clever innovation, ska. Well done!

Thanks, macro!

Postby **alsojp27ace** » 2014.11.27 (18:31)

ska wrote:BTW, took 43-3 sr by over half a second using an innov.

Very nice, taken with some bounce block trickery.

Edit: (43-4)

$###00000000000000000000000001140000000000000000000001111111111111111111100111111111111111111111000111111111111111111110011111111111111111111100011111111111111111111001111111111111111111110001111111111111111111100115000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011140000000000000000000011111111100000000000001111111111000000000000001111111110000000000000111111111100000000000000111111111000000000000011150000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000114000000000000000000000111110000000000000000011111100000000000000000011111000000000000000001150000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000|5^732,540!0^48,540!0^48,516!0^48,492!0^48,468!0^48,444!0^48,420!0^48,396!0^48,372!0^48,348!0^48,324!0^48,300!0^48,276!0^48,252!0^48,228!0^48,204!0^48,180!11^732,564,156,60!12^768,360!12^768,300!12^768,240!12^768,180!12^768,120!12^768,60!0^588,540!0^564,540!0^540,540!0^516,540!0^324,468!0^300,468!0^276,468!0^276,492!0^276,516!0^276,540!0^300,540!0^324,540!0^324,516!0^324,492!12^300,492!12^300,516!6^348,564,3,0,0,3!6^492,564,3,0,0,0!1^564,276!1^492,228!1^564,180!1^636,228!1^420,180!1^492,132!1^564,84!1^636,132!1^708,180!3^252,156!12^60,456!12^60,264!12^36,360!12^36,528!12^36,192!6^60,564,3,0,0,3!6^36,156,3,0,0,1#405:35791394|35791394|35791394|115500770|88360004|89478485|107375633|107374182|89480482|89478485|89478485|17895765|17895697|17895697|35791121|35791394|35791394|53617186|17895697|17895773|89478609|89478485|18175317|89985297|89478485|89478485|89478485|89478485|89478485|17896789|17895697|17895697|107405329|107374182|107374182|107374182|35808870|35791394|237117986|107374182|107374182|107374182|107374182|35791398|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|35791394|16785954|17895697|17895697|1|35791394|17895730|17895697|17895697|0#

http://www.nmaps.net/user/Aidiera · Postby **aids** » 2014.11.27 (22:41)

alsojp27ace wrote:
ska wrote:BTW, took 43-3 sr by over half a second using an innov.
Very nice, taken with some bounce block trickery.

At first I was like, oh shit and then I was like OOOOHH SHEEEEEEETTTT!!

Metanet Forums

Metanet/NReality Speedrun 0th's

Who is online