Abortion is murder, I tells yah!

Debate serious and interesting topics, rant about politics or pop culture, or otherwise converse in essay form about your opinions. The rules of conduct here are a little stricter.
User avatar
Legacy Elite
Legacy Elite
Posts: 67
Joined: 2008.09.26 (18:02)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
MBTI Type: ENTP

Postby Brocerius » 2008.11.20 (21:47)

However, I dont think it should be illegal. At least no more illegal than murdering a kitten.

Morally justifiable murder? Fetuses to have as much rights as animals (read:none)? Discuss.
-----=======Doubtlessly Dastardly=======-----

User avatar
The Rose in Spanish Harlem
Posts: 138
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Contact:

Postby DemonzLunchBreak » 2008.11.20 (21:57)

A pregnant woman must actively support a fetus in order to keep it alive. There's nothing wrong with withdrawing support, especially if something is planted in your body against your will. The fact that it can grow into a person is irrelevant.
Image
post count on the old forums: 1,241

Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1541
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:19)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Huntington, WV
Contact:

Postby Kablizzy » 2008.11.20 (22:12)

There are issues surrounding abortion that are foggy to society - There was a bill here in Colorado this last election that not only would have made all abortions illegal, but all forms of contraception as well (Birth control, condoms, probably even jacking it on the floor). It would have defined a "Person" as anything above a fertilized egg; and anything preventing that egg from being fertilized would have been criminally prosecutable. In which case, every person in colorado would have been immediately prosecutable.

There are quite clear legal precedents that state the consensus. And every time they continue to overturn it - year after year - The consensus says, "Nope. You're still wrong. Please quit trying, kthx." It shouldn't be a legal issue any more than gay marriage should be a legal issue, so I agree that it shouldn't be illegal. In kind, what about animal abortions? Can I coathanger me some kitty-cat faetus? 'Cause if so, I've got a busy weekend ahead.
Image
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.

User avatar
Spoil-Sport
Posts: 659
Joined: 2008.11.02 (23:40)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/eganic
MBTI Type: ENFP

Postby sheganican » 2008.11.20 (22:15)

i know this is gonna sound harsh, but its not like the child knows what its missing.

it deserves to live, but its not like we can ask its opinion, so i think it should be up to the mother.


and so it goes, and so it goes, and so will you soon i suppose.
- Billy Joel

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2008.11.20 (23:56)

The Declaration of Independence of the United States wrote:We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men (that is, people) are created equal, that they are endowed...with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. (notes in bold)
The part of the brain associated with thought, consciousness, emotion etc. is the cerebral cortex which forms the largest part of the developed brain, enveloping the lower structures (Figure B) in two cerebral hemispheres, the first signs of which are visible at 5-6 weeks. (Citation)
The only circumstances I can think of at the moment (correct me if I'm wrong) in which abortion is appropriate are rape, in which case adoption is also an option.

Believe me. I know a girl who was considering abortion after an...illegitimate child, and she thought not aborting was the best thing she ever did.
Image

User avatar
Dance Dance Revolution Android
Posts: 881
Joined: 2008.09.28 (02:06)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/TribulatioN
MBTI Type: ESFP
Location: Canada

Postby TribulatioN » 2008.11.21 (00:06)

I think it shouldn't be up to the government to say what a woman can or can't do to herself in that case.
Cause if abortion is to be illegal, wouldn't guys masturbating also be illegal, since it's killing potential lives?

That was a point I found interesting in a class discussion a while back.
[ispoiler=http://i31.tinypic.com/111p9bo.png]gloomp : gloomp : Why Me : toasters : SkyRay : Slurpee@fpsbanana : KaMikA@Haklabs[/ispoiler]ImageImage[spoiler=Neditor Nation]Currently Challenging: lord_day
Image[/spoiler][spoiler=Puzzle of the Exuberant!]Image
Image
ImageImageImageImageImage[/spoiler]

User avatar
Mr. Glass
Posts: 2019
Joined: 2008.09.27 (20:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/astheoceansblue
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: up down left right start A start

Postby a happy song » 2008.11.21 (00:18)

incluye wrote:Believe me. I know a girl who was considering abortion after an...illegitimate child, and she thought not aborting was the best thing she ever did.
Just because a single women was glad she didn't go through with an abortion is not proper argument against. there will always be hundreds of thousands of women a year who for them abortion will be exatly the right thing to do. So no, I won't 'believe you'.
click sig :::
spoiler


n
::: astheoceansblue
::: My eight episode map pack: SUNSHINEscience
::: Map Theory: The Importance of Function & Form

-
M U S I C
::: The forest and the fire: myspace
::: EP available for FREE download, here.

-
A R T
::: Sig & Avatar Artwork by me - see here!

-
G A M I N G
::: Steam ID: 0:1:20950734
::: Steam Username: brighter


User avatar
Hawaii Five-Oh
Posts: 921
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/condog_111
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Melbourne-ish

Postby Condog » 2008.11.21 (00:25)

I'm pro choice. The only person who can decide if it is the best thing is the mother, not a government or a church.
Image

Ice Climbers are awesome. Deal with it.

User avatar
The Rose in Spanish Harlem
Posts: 138
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Contact:

Postby DemonzLunchBreak » 2008.11.21 (00:31)

incluye,

The Declaration of Independence says "men." Not "people." How do you reach that interpretation? And furthermore, even if they meant to say "people," you have yet to prove that fetuses are people. And, even if they are people, you must provide a good reason for why a woman who wishes to withdraw support for a person may not do so.

As for your neurobiology quote, I'm not very convinced. The beginnings of a cerebral cortex do not constitute a conscious person. A cow also has a cerebral cortex, yet our society (me included) has no problem slaughtering them by the thousands.

Also, anecdotal evidence cannot support statistical claims. Your story doesn't do anything to further an anti-abortion argument.
Image
post count on the old forums: 1,241

User avatar
Mr. Glass
Posts: 2019
Joined: 2008.09.27 (20:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/astheoceansblue
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: up down left right start A start

Postby a happy song » 2008.11.21 (00:44)

DemonzLunchBreak wrote:As for your neurobiology quote, I'm not very convinced. The beginnings of a cerebral cortex do not constitute a conscious person. A cow also has a cerebral cortex, yet our society (me included) has no problem slaughtering them by the thousands.
In this context it's about the potential for conscious life being denied. A Human fetus will most likely grow into a conscious being (certain retardations aside), whereas a cow never will.

I'm Pro-Choice for women withdrawing their support for what is essentially a parasite in their body.

I find it highly amusing that so many anti-choice protesters get themselves so up in arms about saving a fetus, but wouldn't really give a crap about that baby's life after it were born. I do realize there are organizations and bodies that try to find families or give support in certain situations, I'm aiming this more at the masses - those who get behind these things with their votes and weight - who really don't care past satisfying their religious doctrines or superficial morals.
click sig :::
spoiler


n
::: astheoceansblue
::: My eight episode map pack: SUNSHINEscience
::: Map Theory: The Importance of Function & Form

-
M U S I C
::: The forest and the fire: myspace
::: EP available for FREE download, here.

-
A R T
::: Sig & Avatar Artwork by me - see here!

-
G A M I N G
::: Steam ID: 0:1:20950734
::: Steam Username: brighter


User avatar
The Konami Number
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:27)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Atilla

Postby Atilla » 2008.11.21 (00:50)

I think it's fine up to about 12 weeks. After that it starts to get a bit sketchy, since the CNS is quite developed and the child is rapidly approaching the point where it can survive outside the mother (with the help of modern medicine, of course). I'd only support abortion after the first trimester in cases where the woman's life would be in danger otherwise.

@incluye: What if a woman feels that giving birth would inhibit pursuit of happiness, and that a law preventing her from having an abortion is curtailing her liberty? What if carrying the pregnancy to term would also threaten her life due to medical complications? Is the woman not also entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?

Also, assuming for the moment that the child becomes conscious at 6 weeks... do you agree that it's okay to have abortions earlier than that, since you seem to be using it as the condition for the embryo becoming a person?

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir
Posts: 1561
Joined: 2008.09.26 (12:33)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/incluye
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: USofA
Contact:

Postby otters » 2008.11.21 (00:55)

DemonzLunchBreak wrote:The Declaration of Independence says "men." Not "people." How do you reach that interpretation?
I'm getting a copy-paste definition from Dictionary.com that says, "man: a member of the species Homo sapiens or all the members of this species collectively, without regard to sex."
DemonzLunchBreak wrote:As for your neurobiology quote, I'm not very convinced. The beginnings of a cerebral cortex do not constitute a conscious person. A cow also has a cerebral cortex, yet our society (me included) has no problem slaughtering them by the thousands.
See atob.
Atilla wrote:What if carrying the pregnancy to term would also threaten her life due to medical complications?
Hmm...maybe I haven't thought this out enough.
Image

User avatar
The Rose in Spanish Harlem
Posts: 138
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Contact:

Postby DemonzLunchBreak » 2008.11.21 (01:35)

In this context it's about the potential for conscious life being denied. A Human fetus will most likely grow into a conscious being (certain retardations aside), whereas a cow never will.
Pfft.

If this is about potential, then every skin cell that falls off a human body is a murder! Those cells can be theoretically cloned, no? Also, contraception would be out the door if this were the case.




Maybe I'm being overly nitpicky with my "men != people" argument, but I seem to recall a lack of women's rights around the time of the American Revolution.
Image
post count on the old forums: 1,241

Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1541
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:19)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Huntington, WV
Contact:

Postby Kablizzy » 2008.11.21 (01:38)

In this context it's about the potential for conscious life being denied. A Human fetus will most likely grow into a conscious being (certain retardations aside), whereas a cow never will.
That's not at all what this is, was, or ever will be about.
Image
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.

User avatar
Mr. Glass
Posts: 2019
Joined: 2008.09.27 (20:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/astheoceansblue
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: up down left right start A start

Postby a happy song » 2008.11.21 (01:41)

Kablizzy wrote:
In this context it's about the potential for conscious life being denied. A Human fetus will most likely grow into a conscious being (certain retardations aside), whereas a cow never will.
That's not at all what this is, was, or ever will be about.
I didn't say it's what I believe, but it certainly is for some people. And within the context of the Human/Cow example, it will hold true for them.

This is all about subjective judgement, after all, you can't deny that the quoted part could be one of the reasons people argue the anti case here.
click sig :::
spoiler


n
::: astheoceansblue
::: My eight episode map pack: SUNSHINEscience
::: Map Theory: The Importance of Function & Form

-
M U S I C
::: The forest and the fire: myspace
::: EP available for FREE download, here.

-
A R T
::: Sig & Avatar Artwork by me - see here!

-
G A M I N G
::: Steam ID: 0:1:20950734
::: Steam Username: brighter


User avatar
Demon Fisherman
Posts: 1265
Joined: 2008.09.19 (06:28)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
MBTI Type: ENTP

Postby blue_tetris » 2008.11.21 (02:21)

If I'm sleeping around without a condom, I'm likely to have a child too. When I wear a condom, I prevent the likely child I would have.

Condoms are for murderers.

I'm good at picking up dates and getting them into the sack, so if I restrain myself from going clubbing then I am prventing a potential child.

Non-socialites are murderers.

Eating vegetables instead of meat lowers your sperm count, clearly killing potential children.

Vegetarians are murderers.
Image
The Real N Sex on the Xerox Space Pimp Online Super Fluffy Pack 1! Super Fluffy Pack 2! Super Crunchy Pack! Mother Thumping Impossible: 2005 MotY! Time is on My Side: 2006 PMotY! Survival map king! Best humor award! Best satire award! Best voice award! Inadvertently intimidating! Assholier than thou! Gdubs is totally back! WIS 14! Cyberzone creator! Clique creator! Most lines on IRC! Ventrilo moderator and regular! Certified Dungeon Master! Most modest person ever! ENTP! Incorrigible alcoholic! CHA 19! AMERICAN! Least pretentious! Elitist extraordinaire! Liberal libertarian! Incapable of experiencing love! Check Safe! Commodore of the Eldritch Seas! Archmagus of the Eleventh Hall! Sheriff of the Uncharted West! Godfather of the IRC Mafia! Pun enthusiast! Quadster! Challenging Dunbar's number! Wikipedian!Approves of 4th Edition! 1,000 Blank White Cards! radio_free_tetris! Migratory! INT 18! Doesn't know when he's being genuine, therefore cannot form lasting relationships with people! Really into black chicks! Even more into Indian chicks and Blasians! Hates moderators! Loves the C word! Tronster! Thinks we should play more Worms! Always wins iSketch! Owns a Wii! Plays as Pikachu in Smash Bros! Wrote literotica! Wrote anime fanfic! Sorta into Asians! Lived and loved the 80's and 90's! Chattiest sig! Cyberzone ][ creator! Operand of the Greater Space Pimp Continuum! Helped lead the forum move!Wizard Date! Participated in the blue_tetris takeover! Pithiest one-liners! Walkin' on, walkin' on broken glass! Seems to have an invisible touch! Economist! Mario hackster! Owner of the most complex D&D campaign setting! Micromanagerial! FREEDOM is all-American! Slowly distancing! Supports the Democrats! Supports the old GOP! CATO Institute fanboy! Penn and Teller fan! Large, in charge, and on a barge! Heralded by community as genius hero! Proud yet humble recipient of the Mare & Raigan Award for 2008! CON 9! Dave of Nazareth! Communist is annoyed with me! Not half bad at images! F.Y.I. I am a medic! It's a spook house, lame ball. Too bad! Space Pimp II: Rags 2 Bitches! F.Y.I. I am a spy! Entire team is babbies! STR 10! Sorta appreciating scythe and atob again, for new reasons! Played CS:S briefly! Welcome to Nebraska! Do you think you can Live! Heist! Portrayer of the mighty 88 Shells! Joyous proprietor of the future estate of Kablizzy and blue_tetris! It's Batmen all the way up! They brought crystals to a sceince fight; that's a good way to lose your cat! Even SlappyMcGee! I'm about to run out of either primates or sexually transmitted diseases! One-upper! Toaster oven clairvoyant Mythomaniac! That's the Magic of Macy's! Half of Half! Spend all my time making love, all my love making time!

User avatar
Ice Cold
Posts: 200
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:18)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Twistkill
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canadia

Postby Twistkill » 2008.11.21 (02:32)

I'm pro life based on the idea that once the seed has been planted, it's already growing, and has the potential to become a human being after its born. Ending its life during this time, despite not being fully developed, is something I take a personal stance on because, barring non-consensual sex, of which there is another option for, engaging in sexual intercourse means the people involved are accepting all potential ramifications of it regardless of any precautions taken. If a woman is raped, then... well, read on.

Adoption, in my eyes, is a risky route to take as an alternative to abortion if a baby was forced on the woman, but it seems to be the more beneficiary one. You give the baby a right to living in this world rather than ending that chance early if the baby is actually unwanted or would not receive adequate care in the hands of the birth mother based on poor finances or other extenuating circumstances. A person (or couple) who wishes to adopt a child and are incapable of carrying one would be given such an opportunity, the birth mother who can't take care of the baby would be relieving herself of the possible negative consequences of bringing a child into the world in an inadequate setting, and the child in question is given the chance at living his or her life. The best thing to do in this situation would ostensibly ensure the capability and responsibility of the adopting person (or couple).

As for the birth in question: if it poses the risk to the mother that would kill her if the baby was to be delivered... well, that is really sticky for me to answer. It would be up to her at that point because now both of their lives are in jeopardy. If the sex was consensual, then if she really was willing to sacrifice her life for the baby's, that is an option, but that's a large emotional toll on her friends and family in addition to bieng an absurdly difficult decision to make. If rape was the reason for this pregnancy, then... wow. I don't really see any alternative than abortion unless by the grace of God she can actually survive.
Image
"A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult."
-Proverbs 12:16
Newfrag is my PSN name. Add me as a friend so we can play and chat, just make sure to tell me you're from these forums or else I'll think you're trying to molest me.

Unsavory Conquistador of the Western Front
Posts: 1541
Joined: 2008.09.19 (12:19)
NUMA Profile: http://www.nmaps.net/user/Kablizzy
MBTI Type: ISTJ
Location: Huntington, WV
Contact:

Postby Kablizzy » 2008.11.21 (02:50)

atob wrote:
Kablizzy wrote:
In this context it's about the potential for conscious life being denied. A Human fetus will most likely grow into a conscious being (certain retardations aside), whereas a cow never will.
That's not at all what this is, was, or ever will be about.
I didn't say it's what I believe, but it certainly is for some people. And within the context of the Human/Cow example, it will hold true for them.

This is all about subjective judgement, after all, you can't deny that the quoted part could be one of the reasons people argue the anti case here.
Well, I can't deny that those are the reasons, I'm just saying that the reasons aren't valid or relevant. Perhaps a bit relevant, but certainly not valid. I mean, of course some people are using those reasons as justification, but people also use God as a justification to kill, which quite certainly doesn't, and won't, ever make that right.
Image
vankusss wrote:What 'more time' means?
I'm going to buy some ham.

User avatar
Legacy Elite
Legacy Elite
Posts: 67
Joined: 2008.09.26 (18:02)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
MBTI Type: ENTP

Postby Brocerius » 2008.11.21 (02:53)

blue_tetris wrote:Vegetarians are murderers.
QFE


One point about abortion though; where should the legal limit be arbitrated? And would it be anything more than that? Is there any reasonable term after which we can no longer morally justify abortion?

------------------

@Twistkill; talking in terms of potential is allways unfortunate. Potential life is far more abundant that life. Why try and force one sort of potential into realization and discard the others?
-----=======Doubtlessly Dastardly=======-----

User avatar
Ice Cold
Posts: 200
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:18)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Twistkill
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canadia

Postby Twistkill » 2008.11.21 (03:01)

Brocerius wrote:@Twistkill; talking in terms of potential is allways unfortunate. Potential life is far more abundant that life. Why try and force one sort of potential into realization and discard the others?
It depends on what tier of potential we're talking about here. Obviously the "killing sperm is killing lives" argument is silly, but when a baby is developing, then that's a different "potential" situation because of the things associated with it.
Image
"A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult."
-Proverbs 12:16
Newfrag is my PSN name. Add me as a friend so we can play and chat, just make sure to tell me you're from these forums or else I'll think you're trying to molest me.

User avatar
The Rose in Spanish Harlem
Posts: 138
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:49)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Contact:

Postby DemonzLunchBreak » 2008.11.21 (03:21)

Twistkill wrote:
Brocerius wrote:@Twistkill; talking in terms of potential is allways unfortunate. Potential life is far more abundant that life. Why try and force one sort of potential into realization and discard the others?
It depends on what tier of potential we're talking about here. Obviously the "killing sperm is killing lives" argument is silly, but when a baby is developing, then that's a different "potential" situation because of the things associated with it.
You haven't made any distinction between the two types of potential. What makes a fetus more of a potential life than sperm or ova?
Image
post count on the old forums: 1,241

User avatar
Slice of Wisdom
Posts: 417
Joined: 2008.09.26 (20:30)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/notkitt
Location: ewww

Postby notsteve » 2008.11.21 (03:26)

i dont understand the anti-choice side :(
Image

User avatar
Ice Cold
Posts: 200
Joined: 2008.09.26 (05:18)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/Twistkill
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canadia

Postby Twistkill » 2008.11.21 (03:28)

DemonzLunchBreak wrote:You haven't made any distinction between the two types of potential. What makes a fetus more of a potential life than sperm or ova?
It has begun developing into a human being and is more valuable than the two individually because nothing can occur until they make contact. They are also produced en masse whereas one developing fetus takes months before it will be born and there many more permanent hazards to it when it's in the mother's womb compared to a sperm's short life span and little to no consequences for its termination.
Image
"A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult."
-Proverbs 12:16
Newfrag is my PSN name. Add me as a friend so we can play and chat, just make sure to tell me you're from these forums or else I'll think you're trying to molest me.

User avatar
Remembering Hoxygen
Posts: 969
Joined: 2008.09.27 (21:40)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/
MBTI Type: INFP
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Postby capt_weasle » 2008.11.21 (03:30)

Life: 1 a: the quality that distinguishes a vital and functional being from a dead body b: a principle or force that is considered to underlie the distinctive quality of animate beings c: an organismic state characterized by capacity for metabolism, growth, reaction to stimuli, and reproduction
So, beginning at conception, the zygote is growing and alive. Of course at this point it isn't any more alive than a plant, but the point remains. To begin I am pro-life, and disagree with the termination of a growing fetus before birth. I don't think that this really has a lot to do with women's rights, as we are dealing with a completely different human being, which comes from her and the father. Despite not having rights as a citizen (a person in the US is considered a citizen after birth), but that does not mean it doesn't have rights as a human being. So looking at the definition of life and the definition of a human being (defined as having the characteristics of such and containing the specific DNA and chromosomes as a human - which the fetus does), you cannot say that the fetus is not a human being, or is not alive. About potential life, there already is life, it is already human. Of course there is the potential of conscience life, but that isn't very relevant. You shouldn't abort a life just because it might not become a thinking being.

Around 98% of abortions occur because it is convenient for the woman in question. That I hate. There are several options after birth, such as adoption. Don't talk about the pursuit of happiness in regards to the Declaration, because it's pretty much half the woman's fault for getting pregnant in the first place (the other half falling on the father), and if you argue for choice, it should not be "women's rights" it should be "rights." The child is half hers. Yes, it is growing inside of her body, but what is growing is an entirely different person. Unfortunately most people don't get that sex produces babies. If you argue that the woman was rights granted to her through the government to "choose," that can be used on the other side, too. If the government does not allow discrimination based on sex, gender, location, income, etc., why should it be withheld from a growing fetus? It didn't choose to be conceived, so it should have a fair shot at life. Now we approach the 2% of women who did not consent to sex, and thus do not wish to have the child. Of course it is very rare for someone to get pregnant from rape. For those who do I don't believe that abortion is a good alternative. First off, abortion can be extremely stressful and for many, damaging, after the fact. The child isn't going to go become an ax murder, and as long as it falls into the care of a loving family, will most likely be fine.

For the small percentage of women who face complications due to their pregnancy, it can only go a few ways. If only the child can be saved, or vice-verse, then it can't really be stopped. However, if there is a choice (either to save her or the child), then it should be up to the mother. That is a personal decision to "take a bullet" for someone else or choose to save their own life.

Oh, and I don't care about condoms or masturbation, because you aren't killing a life any more than eating an egg. Until conception has taken place, there isn't really much to worry about. (See my above point on potential life).
Image
"How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot: Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resign'd" ~ Alexander Pope
"Boredom is not an appropriate response to exploding cars" ~ Hugh Laurie

User avatar
Mr. Glass
Posts: 2019
Joined: 2008.09.27 (20:22)
NUMA Profile: http://nmaps.net/user/astheoceansblue
MBTI Type: ENTP
Location: up down left right start A start

Postby a happy song » 2008.11.21 (03:46)

What's the difference though? If a couple don't make use of the egg and sperm at a particular point and they don't produce a life it has the same outcome as if they do and abort the fetus. In both instances the potential life is wasted.

It really makes no difference to the world whether the pregnancy goes further or not. Up until a point the fetus is nothing but a parasite attached and entirely dependant on the mothers body, it's not an independent being and shouldn't be treated as such.
click sig :::
spoiler


n
::: astheoceansblue
::: My eight episode map pack: SUNSHINEscience
::: Map Theory: The Importance of Function & Form

-
M U S I C
::: The forest and the fire: myspace
::: EP available for FREE download, here.

-
A R T
::: Sig & Avatar Artwork by me - see here!

-
G A M I N G
::: Steam ID: 0:1:20950734
::: Steam Username: brighter



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests